ShareThis Page
Outdoors

Hunters ignore warnings, eat deer with CWD

Everybody Adventures
| Saturday, March 3, 2018, 3:12 p.m.
White-tailed deer are the most popular game animal with hunters across Pennsylvania and much of the nation and account for lots of food on the table. But hunters only should eat healthy animals.
Bob Frye | Everybody Adventures
White-tailed deer are the most popular game animal with hunters across Pennsylvania and much of the nation and account for lots of food on the table. But hunters only should eat healthy animals.

A few hunters, at least, willingly are eating sick deer.

Most of the news coming out of the Pennsylvania Game Commission's press conference announcing creation of a fourth disease management area — because of yet more chronic wasting disease — was sad but all too expected.

Pennsylvania's Department of Agriculture said Feb. 12 that a farm-raised deer in Lancaster County tested positive for the always-fatal ailment.

Disease management area 4 is the predictable result.

Hunters in Lancaster, Lebanon and Berks counties will be dealing with limitations on how they can hunt and what they can do with deer they kill. The use and even possession of urine-based attractants is now off limits, for example. So, too, is feeding deer. Hunters will be limited in where they can get deer processed or heads mounted, as well.

"The necessity of another disease management area from CWD is devastating. This will impact the citizens in that area. It will impact out hunters in that area," commission executive director Bryan Burhans said.

They're not alone.

The expansion of "this insidious disease," as Burhans called it, will cost all hunters across the state. He said they'll see a bigger chunk of their license dollars going to combat the disease.

Non-hunters will feel the sting, too, said John Kline, governmental affairs director for the Pennsylvania federation of Sportsmen's Clubs.

Hunting is a $1.6 billion industry in the state, he said. Anything that threatens that hurts businesses big and small.

"The threat is not just for hunters," Kline said.

There likely is more bad news coming.

Disease management areas 2 and 3 will probably grow before fall because of new CWD-positive deer discovered near their boundaries. At the same time, the total number of sick deer discovered statewide in 2017 is higher than the total detected in the five years prior.

And that's with some samples yet to come back from testing.

Still, all that news, bad as is it, seems almost familiar.

What isn't familiar is news that some hunters are willing to consume deer known to be positive for wasting disease.

Wayne Laroche, special assistant for CWD for the commission, said there is no known case of a human contracting wasting disease from eating venison.

However, last year, Canadian researchers successfully infected macaque monkeys with CWD by feeding them muscle tissue from CWD-infected deer and elk. That marked the first time transmission of the disease via consumption of meat was shown possible.

That's noteworthy for hunters.

"If CWD could spread to people, it would most likely be through eating of infected deer and elk," says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"So that concern is growing," Laroche said.

Not all hunters are getting the message or seem to understand the risks.

"We also have concerns, and the (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) now advises any sick deer should not be placed into the food stream. You should not eat them," Laroche said. "We'd advise that people should not eat any sick-looking deer, regardless of what the disease is.

"And we still have people that insist on eating deer after we've tested them and told them it was (CWD) positive. We advise against that."

The commission offered free CWD testing of all deer taken within a disease area last season. It will do so again this year, communications director Travis Lau said.

Hunters who submit their deer's head for testing are notified of test results, usually within two weeks.

They should wait to eat any venison until after hearing from the commission, Laroche said.

In the meantime, the commission will ramp up the sampling of deer in disease management area 4. A contractor will be hired to collect roadkill for testing. Deer management assistance program permits will made available to use anywhere within the area they have permission to hunt, too.

That will allow for the harvest of additional antlerless deer.

Whether that will be enough to slow the spread of CWD, or stomp it out, remains to be seen.

The first disease management area established in the state, back in 2012, was dissolved last year after five consecutive years of no sick deer being discovered.

That's the only good news. In every other respect, it's a bad situation, Burhans said.

Wasting disease will not "burn out" over time. There's no evidence it's always existed — and that deer have learned to adapt to it — over time, either, he said.

He compared it to the blight that wiped out chestnut trees a century ago. Chestnuts were a mainstay for wildlife, perhaps the No. 1 food source across the landscape.

Now they're gone.

Burhans said the commission is committed "to doing everything we can possibly do" to prevent wasting disease from having a similar impact on white-tailed deer and hunting.

But that's a challenge.

"Chronic wasting disease is another one of those diseases that's an ecological disaster," Burhans said.

Bob Frye is the everybodyadventures.com editor. Reach him at 412-216-0193 or bfrye@535mediallc.com. See other stories, blogs, videos and more at everybodyadventures.com.

Article by Bob Frye, Everybody Adventures,

http://www.everybodyadventures.com

Copyright © 535media, LLC

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me