ShareThis Page

Outdoors notebook: Role of mosquitoes in grouse decline probed

Bob Frye
| Tuesday, May 5, 2015, 5:51 p.m.

Are you a believer that all things in nature are connected?

If so, ruffed grouse may be in line for trouble.

The Pennsylvania Game Commission is exploring what role West Nile virus might be having in depressing ruffed grouse populations.

No one believes the mosquito-borne illness is the primary cause behind a decline in grouse, commission wildlife veterinarian Justin Brown said. Loss of habitat is clearly No. 1, he said.

But, Brown added, grouse may be more susceptible to the disease than other species. That may explain why some hunters have noted grouse numbers being down even in areas with good habitat, he said.

The commission will try to collect eggs from wild Pennsylvania grouse, then raise them in a mosquito-proof environment to see how they fare.

“We're very interested in the result of this study,” Brown said. “We think it has great value.”

Meanwhile, to the detriment of grouse, mosquito populations could conceivably increase in the future, as one of their chief predators is in trouble.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will list the northern long-eared bat as an endangered species as of May 30.

Populations of the mosquito-eating bat have declined by up to 99 percent because of an infection known as white-nose syndrome. The listing is meant to offer them some protection, primarily during the summer “pup-rearing” season, the service said.

But the listing comes with some caveats.

Greg Turner, bat biologist for the commission, said that under what's known as the federal “4(d)” rule, there will be some exceptions not typically allowed. Timbering operations will be allowed to continue, bats can be removed from homes in nuisance situations, and those with permits can continue to capture and handle bats, for instance, he added.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said the exceptions ensure landowners are not “unduly burdened” by regulations that do nothing to further protect the bats.

But at least one organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, has filed lawsuits suggesting the protections don't go far enough, Turner said.

Grants awarded

The Western Pennsylvania Conservancy and the Dominion Foundation recently awarded $30,000 to watershed groups in 15 counties via their watershed minigrant program.

The Westmoreland County-based Tubmill Trout Club got the largest grant, worth $5,000, for this year's showcase project. The club will do stream bank stabilization and habitat enhancement work along Hendricks Run. The money will pay for rock, logs, rebar, grass seed, mulch and contractor fees.

Other groups getting money include Crooked Creek Watershed Association in Armstrong County; Paddle Without Pollution and Turtle Creek and Little Sewickley Creek watershed associations in Allegheny; Jacobs Creek Watershed Association, Westmoreland Cleanways and the Monastery Run Improvement Project in Westmoreland; Blacklick Creek Watershed Association and Evergreen Conservancy in Indiana; Buffalo Creek Watershed Association in Washington; Paint Creek Regional Watershed Association in Somerset; Connoquenessing Watershed Alliance in Butler; and Chest Creek and Clearfield Creek watershed associations and Conemaugh Valley Conservancy in Cambria.

Dead elk

Talk about odd.

In Jackson Hole, Wyo., recently, a herd of 31 elk were found floating in Palisades Reservoir, all dead. The cause?

They fell through the ice and drowned. As many as 20 more may have also died but drifted away before discovery, wildlife officials said.

Such cases aren't totally unheard of. A herd of 20 elk died that way in Colorado in December.

But Wyoming officials said this case was the largest in 15 or so years.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me