Patric Hornqvist joins Penguins lineup at home vs. Ducks |

Patric Hornqvist joins Penguins lineup at home vs. Ducks

Seth Rorabaugh
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Patric Hornqvist takes out the Blue Jackets’ Sonny Milano in the second period Thursday, Sept. 19, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

Pittsburgh Penguins forward Patric Hornqvist returned to the lineup for Thursday’s game against the Anaheim Ducks at PPG Paints Arena. He left Tuesday’s 4-1 home loss to the Winnipeg Jets after the first period when he suffered an undisclosed injury as a result of being struck by a shot from teammate Kris Letang.

His return buoyed a team already dealing with a group of injury-ravaged forwards. Nick Bjugstad, Alex Galchenyuk, Evgeni Malkin and Bryan Rust are on injured reserve because of undisclosed ailments.

Marino gets his shot

Veteran defenseman Erik Gudbranson was scratched in favor of rookie defenseman John Marino.

Acquired at the trade deadline last season from the Vancouver Canucks, Gudbranson has the 10th-largest salary cap hit on the team at $4 million.

During Tuesday’s loss to the Jets, Gudbranson was beaten by Winnipeg forward Mark Scheifele in a one-on-one battle leading to Scheifele setting up his team’s first goal by rookie defenseman Ville Heinola in the first period.

In three games, Gudbranson had no points. He was scratched along with defensemen Juuso Riikola and Chad Ruhwedel.

Pair of debuts

Forwards Andrew Agozzino and Adam Johnson each made their season debuts. Johnson was recalled from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton on Wednesday, and Agozzino was recalled Monday.

Johnson, 25, appeared in six NHL games last season and recorded two assists. That prior experience in the NHL has made this recall slightly more routine.

“A little bit,” said Johnson, an undrafted free agent. “I’m a little less nervous than I was last year coming in. It’s a little bit more comfortable now. I’m really excited to help this team get a win.”

Agozzino, 28, made his Penguins debut after signing as an unrestricted free agent this past offseason. Before Tuesday, he had 21 career NHL games on his resume, all with the Colorado Avalanche over three seasons.

He began this season as the No. 1 center with the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins, and in effect, the organization’s No. 5 center. He agreed a two-year two-way contract with the Penguins this summer after sensing a better chance to see time in the NHL than he experienced with Colorado.

“It’s tough to gauge that so early in the summer, but I definitely thought there was some opportunity here,” Agozzino said. “The organization kind of fits the style that I play. It was exciting for me to have a different set of eyes on me and move to the Eastern Conference, a new organization. Kind of a fresh start.”

New challenge

The Penguins avoided an even worse defeat against the Jets on Tuesday by issuing a coach’s challenge on a would-be goal late in the second period that would have made it a 5-1 deficit. They challenged the play on the basis of the sequence being offside and were successful.

Coach Mike Sullivan and staff, namely video coach Andy Saucier, are still adjusting to the NHL’s rule changes that could result in a bench penalty for unsuccessful challenges. Previously, teams lost a timeout for failed challenges.

“The hardest one for me is goalie interference because there is so much ambiguity to what is actually goalie interference,” Sullivan said. “If something is close, it makes it real difficult for a coaching staff to challenge now. It’s one thing to lose a timeout. It’s another thing to get a two-minute minor penalty, and now you put your opponent on the power play right after they score.

“That’s something that we’ve talked about. We’ve defined a criteria on what we’re going to challenge for and when. We’re all on same page on how we go about that process, but that criteria has changed based on the rules.”

Seth Rorabaugh is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Seth by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.