Patriots cornerback: Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster not among NFL’s best receivers | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Patriots cornerback: Steelers’ JuJu Smith-Schuster not among NFL’s best receivers

Chris Adamski
1635728_web1_AP_19143643605520--1-
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster, right, joins Ryan Switzer, center, and James Washington, left, during an organized team activity session May 23, 2019.

Three days before JuJu Smith-Schuster’s debut as the Pittsburgh Steelers’ No. 1 receiver, did one of the players who will be tasked to defend Smith-Schuster diss him?

New England Patriots cornerback J.C. Jackson had an exchange with Boston-area radio reporter Ryan Hannable that suggests so, according to a post to Hannable’s verified Twitter account.

Hannable, who works for WEEI radio, tweeted he asked Jackson about facing the league’s best receivers now that he’s in his second pro season.

Jackson didn’t know to whom Hannable was referring, and when told Smith-Schuster was “one of” the best receivers in the NFL, Hannable wrote that Jackson rolled his eyes.

“In my opinion, I don’t think (Smith-Schuster is one of the best receivers in the league),” Jackson said, according to Hannable. “There’s a lot of good receivers in the NFL.”

Jackson seemed to soften his stance moments later.

“I mean, he’s a great receiver, I’m not saying (he’s not),” Jackson said. “He’s a good football player.”

Last season, Smith-Schuster ranked fifth in the league in receiving yards with 1,426 and tied for sixth in catches with 111.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.