Paul Newberry: Penny-pinching Rays running with big-market teams |

Paul Newberry: Penny-pinching Rays running with big-market teams

Associated Press
Tampa Bay Rays’ Willy Adames runs the bases after hitting a home run during the fourth inning against the New York Yankees in a baseball game Friday, May 17, 2019, in New York.

They play in an architectural nightmare of a ballpark.

They are treated like pariahs in their own community.

They have to get by with one of baseball’s stingiest payrolls.

Yet, somehow, the Tampa Bay Rays make it work.

It’s one of the most compelling stories in sports, even if few people take notice.

“Whatever you want to label us, it’s honestly irrelevant,” outfielder Kevin Kiermaier said. “We know we’re good, and we can go a long way with the guys we have here.”

The Rays went into a weekend series against the mighty New York Yankees leading the AL East by a half-game. Never mind Tampa Bay started the year with a penny-pinching payroll of just $60.6 million — $10 million less than the 29th-lowest team (a Miami Marlins team headed toward a historically awful season) and barely a fourth of what the reigning World Series champion Boston Red Sox doled out to assemble the most expensive roster.

To add a bit more perspective, Bryce Harper will take home $30 million this year after signing a record-breaking deal with the Philadelphia Phillies.

The Rays put together a whole team for about twice that amount.

When the Rays (and their West Coast soul mates, the Oakland Athletics) have a hole to fill, they can’t just throw money at it like the big-market teams. They have to maintain a never-ending cycle of prescient drafts (AL Cy Young winner Blake Snell was a first-round pick in 2011), wily trades (Austin Meadows and Tyler Glasnow are top young players acquired from the Pirates) and scouring free agency for the occasional bargain (15-game winner Charlie Morton took a two-year contract that didn’t break the bank).

Stability is not something the Rays can afford, so the roster is turning over constantly. Kiermaier is the only player on the current 25-man squad who was with Tampa Bay before 2017.

Also required: thinking outside the box, which led to the Rays to the idea of starting the game with an “opener” — a reliever who works just the first inning or two before turning the game over to other relievers, allowing the team to shorten its rotation, maximize its bullpen and create matchup problems for opposing lineups.

“They maximize their roster, and they use their roster very uniquely,” said manager A.J. Hinch of the Houston Astros, another big-payroll team.

Since their breakthrough 2008 season, when the Rays posted the first winning record in franchise history and made it all the way to the World Series, they have bucked the odds to stay competitive — even while playing alongside the Red Sox and Yankees in one of baseball’s toughest divisions.

Tampa Bay has five 90-win campaigns, three playoff appearances and only one really awful season over the past decade. They seemed to be fading just a bit after losing wunderkind general manager Andrew Friedman to the Los Angeles Dodgers and longtime manager Joe Maddon to the Chicago Cubs, only to bounce back last season with a 90-72 mark.

General manager Erik Neander, a 36-year-old and a numbers-savvy graduate of Virginia Tech who didn’t have any experience as a player or coach when he joined the Rays’ front office, picked up where Friedman left off. Kevin Cash was only 37 when he replaced Maddon but quickly developed into one of baseball’s most-respected managers.

Like those who came before them, there’s a real good chance Neander and Cash will find themselves fielding offers from better-funded teams in the near future. But, for now, they’re enjoying the challenge of making sure the Rays don’t just survive, but thrive.

“There’s no doubt baseball has done one thing for many consecutive years kind of one way,” Cash said, relishing the chance to shake things up with innovations like the opener.

Playing in desolate Tropicana Field, a 1980s relic that essentially epitomizes everything that can go wrong when designing a ballpark (catwalks, anyone?), the Rays have pushed for more than a decade to build a spiffy new home.

No luck.

While the Rays lead the big leagues in fancy stadium drawings, they’ve never managed to turn one spade of dirt. A proposed facility along the St. Petersburg waterfront, complete with a retractable roof that resembled a giant sail, sank a decade ago. Just last December the team abruptly called off its plan to build a tiny new home on the other side of the bay, after pitching a 30,000-seat stadium with sliding glass walls and a translucent roof in the historic Ybor City neighborhood of Tampa.

For now, the Rays’ big stadium move was closing off the entire upper deck at Tropicana Field, reducing the official capacity to about 25,000 in a facility that can hold up to 45,000. They certainly don’t need all those seats, having drawn a paltry 14,540 per game despite a 26-15 start.

Only the Marlins attract fewer fans, but they’ve worked hard to drive crowds away.

The Rays deserve far better support than they’ve received from the Tampa Bay area, ranking last or next-to-last in attendance for eight straight seasons. Major League Baseball should probably be pushing to find this franchise a new home (Montreal? Portland? Anywhere?), especially since the Ybor City project fell through.

In the meantime, the Rays just go about their business.

Let others have massive payrolls, and fancy ballparks, and rabid fan support.

None are required for this remarkably resilient franchise.

Categories: Sports | MLB
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.