Paul Steigerwald reflects on Penguins drafting Mario Lemieux |
Breakfast With Benz

Paul Steigerwald reflects on Penguins drafting Mario Lemieux

Tim Benz
Mario Lemieux of the Pittsburgh Penguins reacts in first period after scoring his first NHL goal against the Boston Bruins at Boston Garden, Oct. 11, 1984.

What did you do for “Happy Mario Day?”

Did you go down the YouTube Mario Lemieux highlight rabbit hole? Wear a No. 66 jersey to Sunday dinner? Maybe place a bouquet at the statue in front of PPG Paints Arena?

Those are all completely appropriate responses, by the way.

However you acknowledged the 35th anniversary on Sunday of the day the Penguins drafted Le Magnifique, good for you.

Mark Madden and I jumped back to June 9, 1984 during our “Madden Monday” podcast. But I wanted to give a little more time to the anniversary.

So Paul Steigerwald joined me for the podcast. The long-time Penguins broadcast host and play-by-play voice was on hand in Montreal the day Lemieux was selected by general manager Eddie Johnston. Steigy was part of the Penguins marketing department at the time. And he has dozens of memories of the day, the anticipation of the pick, and the immediate reaction of the city to it.

LISTEN: Paul Steigerwald reflects on Mario’s draft day

There was no lottery back in the ’80s. So Penguins fans knew who was being picked from the moment the club successfully tank … uh … unfortunately failed to win 18 of their final 21 games during the 1983-84 season.

Steigy has vivid recollections of the awkwardness when Lemieux refused to go down to the draft floor and put on the Penguins jersey. He also talks about how the pick was received within management and what the plan was to introduce Lemieux to Pittsburgh.

Because there was a strategy in place to prime the fanbase for how hockey was going to forever change in the city.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.