Penalty on field goal results in 4-point swing that hurts Steelers in loss | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Penalty on field goal results in 4-point swing that hurts Steelers in loss

Joe Rutter
1679199_web1_gtr-Steelers28-091619
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers Sean Davis did not finish the game against the Seahawks Sunday, Sept. 15, 2019 at Heinz Field. An illegal block by Davis wiped out a 34-yard touchdown by Mark Barron on a fumble return.

Not only were the Pittsburgh Steelers hurt by a costly pass-interference call against safety Terrell Edmunds in the fourth quarter of a 28-26 loss to Seattle on Sunday, they were on the wrong end of a four-point swing in the second courtesy of another penalty.

Nose tackle Dan McCullers, playing on the field-goal-block unit, was called for a personal foul with 8 minutes, 48 seconds left while Jason Myers was in the process of making a 46-yard field goal.

Instead of the Steelers holding a 7-3 lead, the defense had to go back on the field as the Seahawks were given a first down at the 14, the ball being moved half the distance to the goal line.

On the next play, Russell Wilson threw a 14-yard touchdown pass to tight end Will Dissly to tie the score 7-7.

The swing was pivotal in the Steelers’ two-point loss.

“Supposedly, he made contact with the head and neck area of the center,” Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said of McCullers’ penalty. “That wasn’t his intention. That wasn’t our intention. We were trying to skinny the gap. We will take a look at the video.”

The Steelers were penalized five times for 78 yards. Sean Davis was called for an illegal block that negated a 34-yard touchdown return on Mark Barron’s fumble recovery.

“We didn’t play clean enough, particularly in some moments,” Tomlin said.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.