Penguins assign Joseph Blandisi, Adam Johnson to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins assign Joseph Blandisi, Adam Johnson to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton

Seth Rorabaugh
1868491_web1_gtr-pens05-092318
Penguins forward Adam Johnson has two points (one goal, one assist) in seven games this season.

With several players on the verge of returning to the lineup from injured reserve, the Penguins assigned forwards Joseph Blandisi and Adam Johnson to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton of the American Hockey League.

Johnson, 25, was recalled on Oct. 9. In seven games, he scored two points (one goal, one assist). He was sidelined for the past two games due to an undisclosed injury

Blandisi, 25, was recalled on Oct. 11. He also scored two points (one goal, one assist) in seven games.

Forward Alex Galchenyuk and defenseman Brian Dumoulin officially remain on injured reserve due to undisclosed ailments but participated in practice in Cranberry on Tuesday. Coach Mike Sullivan described them as “game-time” decisions for Tuesday’s home contest against the rival Philadelphia Flyers.


Forward Evgeni Malkin also practiced but wore a red “no contact” jersey for most of session. He remains on injured reserve but suggested he wants to return for Saturday’s home game against the Edmonton Oilers.

Follow the Penguins all season long.

Seth Rorabaugh is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Seth by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.