Stormy offseason sent message to Kris Letang, Penguins stars |

Stormy offseason sent message to Kris Letang, Penguins stars

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Kris Letang shoots during a team skate Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2019 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Kris Letang takes a shot during team skate Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2019 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Kris Letang and Sidney Crosby celebrate with Evgeni Malkin after Malkin’s goal against the Capitals in the third period Thursday, Oct. 4, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

Many words have been used to describe the four-game sweep at the hands of the New York Islanders that ended the Pittsburgh Penguins’ season in the first round of the playoffs in April.

Kris Letang came up with another phrase for it as he and 14 teammates gathered for an informal skate Tuesday morning at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.

A waste.

“I’m one year closer to retirement,” Letang said. “I try to make as much as I can (of) my time in the NHL. … We want to win every year. Maybe we wasted it one year last year, but this year is a new year. That’s the only thing I’m thinking of.”

As the Penguins learned repeatedly from 2010-15, wasted opportunities often lead to tumultuous offseasons. It was no different this summer as trade rumors swirled around Letang and Evgeni Malkin before Phil Kessel was dealt to Arizona.

With two days left until the start of training camp Friday, here are two thoughts Letang had about the Penguins’ offseason.

1. Kessel’s contributions

There’s a temptation to suggest that because the Penguins didn’t move Malkin or Letang, their offseason overhaul wasn’t as dramatic as expected.

Letang pushed back against that notion, pointing out moving Kessel is a significant change.

Take the power play, for example. For the past four seasons, the same five players have formed a potent top unit for the Penguins: Kessel, Letang, Malkin, Sidney Crosby and Patric Hornqvist.

Now, one of the first orders of business at training camp will be deciding on a new five-man configuration that doesn’t include Kessel’s playmaking acumen on the left half-wall.

“Obviously he’s a great player,” Letang said. “He was a good player on our power play, a good passer, a guy that can enter the zone with control. Somebody has to kind of take that role and maybe try to fill his spot, but maybe in a different way, maybe more of a shooting role or something like that. I don’t know. It’s too early to tell.”

2. Leave a message

By letting the rumors about Malkin and Letang fester before ultimately trading Kessel, it’s fair to suggest general manager Jim Rutherford intended to send a summer message to the players remaining on the team: Clean it up, or anyone not named Crosby can be moved out.

Whether that was Rutherford’s intention or not, that’s pretty much how Letang took it.

“We lost a guy who helped us win Stanley Cups,” Letang said. “It kind of sends you a message (about) how good the league is when you can trade guys like this and try to get better in different areas and try to change your lineup.

“It tells you that you have to bring your A game every night and try to be the best player out there. There’s so many good players. I’m pretty happy to be a Penguin one more year, I guess.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.