Penguins bring back Zach Trotman, Kevin Czuczman for defensive depth | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins bring back Zach Trotman, Kevin Czuczman for defensive depth

Jonathan Bombulie
1340315_web1_gtr-PensTrotman-032719
AP
Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Zach Trotman, left, passes the puck against Columbus Blue Jackets forward Brandon Dubinsky during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Columbus, Ohio, Saturday, March 9, 2019.

The Pittsburgh Penguins shored up their defensive depth Wednesday, re-signing Zach Trotman and Kevin Czuczman to two-year, two-way contracts.

Both contracts will pay $700,000 annually at the NHL level.

Trotman, 28, has been a call-up option for the Penguins each of the last two seasons. Last year, he played 13 games in the NHL, recording an assist, and 24 games in the AHL with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.

Trotman is a sturdy, 6-foot-3, 219-pound defender with a right-handed shot.

“Zach’s role with us last year was definitely not easy,” assistant GM Bill Guerin said in a release. “Sometimes a depth defenseman has to sit out for a number of games and is expected to come in and be on top of his game, and he did an excellent job with that.”

Czuczman, 28, has been with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton each of the past two seasons, averaging four goals and 28 points per season.

“He is capable to play in all situations on the ice and is a true leader for us in Wilkes-Barre,” Guerin said. “We’re glad to have him back.”

Trotman and Czuczman (pronounced Church-man) slot in around ninth and 10th on the organization’s defensive depth chart.

— Jonathan Bombulie

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.