Penguins notebook: Big 5th-round pick Judd Caulfield works on hands |

Penguins notebook: Big 5th-round pick Judd Caulfield works on hands

Chris Adamski
Judd Caulfield was selected 145th overall by the Penguins during the NHL Draft at Rogers Arena on June 22, 2019.

At 6-foot-3, 204 pounds and coming off a season in which he had 12 goals in 64 games prior to getting drafted by the Pittsburgh Penguins, it isn’t difficult for Judd Caulfield to identify what he wants to improve at.

“I just need to work on my hands and shooting ability now,” the wing said from Penguins development camp Friday, six days after he was taken at No. 145 overall in the fifth round.

One of the flurry of big forwards the Penguins took last week, Caulfield said he embraces that “power forward” title and admires the game of the Islanders’ Anders Lee.

“I am a big guy, so I like to be physical when I can and kind of play down low in the gritty areas and take pucks to the net when I can and play well in the D-zone too,” said Caulfield, who will attend North Dakota in the fall.

Gorman better in Year 2

At last year’s camp, Liam Gorman was only a few days removed from being taken in the sixth round of the draft.

Fifty-two weeks later, Gorman looks different (an added 10-15 pounds), plays differently (faster and quicker on his skates), and he said he has a “totally different mindset,” too.

“Last year, I came in and it was like just chaos for me,” Gorman said Friday. “Everything was happening so quick. I am just trying to get a grip on everything that’s going on. But this year it’s been a lot easier coming in, and I have been more confident in myself.”

A year before the Penguins had an obvious trend in drafting that way, Gorman was the closest thing to the proverbial “power forward” they drafted in 2018. He was listed as a 6-3, 194-pound center at the time of his draft.

But in the year since, Gorman focused on his skating, and he switched his college commitment from Boston U. to Princeton.

“You’ve gotta realize there is life after hockey and that something can happen any day, and you want to be able to do have something you can lean back on,” Gorman said. “So (an Ivy League education) is definitely a huge part (of the switch).”

Sleeper prospect

Winger Jan Drozg remains a sleeper prospect in the Penguins organization, a player who has put together a fairly strong resume outside of the glare of the spotlight. He’s one of the better players to come out of his home country, but that country is Slovenia, a nation with a population of around 2 million.

He was his junior team’s leading scorer each of the past two seasons, averaging 18 goals and 56 points, but Shawinigan hasn’t been one of the Quebec Major Junior League’s marquee clubs. Drozg, 20, will get his chance to make some headlines when he turns pro in the fall.

“No one is perfect. Everyone needs to do something better. I work to be better every day, to not make so many mistakes in the game,” Drozg said. “I played a skilled game. There’s more room for mistakes. That’s normal. But I try to work on my game to make as few mistakes as possible.”

Against the grain

Quinn Preston, a 5-10 winger with impressive junior hockey scoring credentials who is in camp as a tryout, wants to make one thing clear. He’s not trying to be a smart aleck.

Yes, he’s a Michigan native who plays at Ohio State, where he’s a rising sophomore. And yes, he’s a Penguins fan despite growing up in the heart of Red Wings country. But he’s not trying to stir up trouble. It just worked out that way.

“I grew up a huge Michigan fan. My dad’s a diehard Michigan fan. Then I visited Ohio State … and I fell in love with the place. It’s a little farther from home, which I like,” Preston said. “I grew up as a Detroit Red Wings fan, but watching (Sidney) Crosby play and how the team’s been so successful, I sort of turned that way.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.