ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin hopes injury doesn’t prolong slump |

Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin hopes injury doesn’t prolong slump

Jonathan Bombulie
The Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin looks to pass against the Devils on Monday, Jan. 28, 2019. Malkin is working to return from an upper-body injury and recover from a long slump.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin plays against the Islanders in the first period Thursday, Dec. 6, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena. Malkin is working to return from an upper-body injury and recover from a long slump.

TAMPA, Fla. — Evgeni Malkin is a little bit nervous.

It’s not a condition that plagues him often, as his Conn Smythe Trophy and three Stanley Cup rings can attest, but that’s the emotion he felt as he sat in his locker stall after the Pittsburgh Penguins practiced Friday afternoon at Amalie Arena in Tampa.

Malkin is in the midst of a trying season. After a typically superb start, a prolonged slump that began in early November has lasted through much of the winter.

Last Wednesday, it looked like Malkin’s season had reached a turning point. He was a force in a 4-2 Penguins victory over Tampa Bay, playing with emotion and physicality, recording two assists and fighting Steven Stamkos in a memorable bout of superstar-on-superstar violence.

Then he woke up the next morning in considerable pain.

He hasn’t played since, which is why he’s nervous.

He’s not worried he’s going to miss too much more time because of his upper-body injury. He participated in a full team practice Friday, albeit in a red, noncontact jersey, and said his condition slowly is improving. He said he might be back as soon as Monday’s game in Philadelphia, though that’s probably a little optimistic.

What he’s worried about is the momentum of the Tampa Bay game being gone and the dark days of his long slump returning.

“Step forward if I play next game, but I missed four games,” Malkin said. “I’m a little bit nervous now again. Yeah, I have a great game. We win 4-2. I look forward. (But) it’s life. We have injuries. We have problems sometimes. I’m working back to do my best. I remember I played good against Tampa, but we’ll see what’s going on.”

Malkin would love to say he’s turned a corner. He’d like to vow that as soon as he’s healthy, he’ll be back to playing the dominant game he’s accustomed to.

But he didn’t do that Friday, mostly because he knows talk is cheap.

“If I say right now yes, and I’m back and not playing great, it’s nothing,” Malkin said. “We can talk about my game every day. We’ll see when I’m back. Of course I’m trying to do my best. Of course I have great motivation right now.”

One part of that motivation: Malkin is 15 points shy of 1,000 for his career.

“I want it this year,” he said.

Another part: The desire for a fourth Stanley Cup ring still burns inside him.

“We want, together, to play in playoffs,” Malkin said. “We want to be a great team. We want the Cup back. It’s not a secret. We’re hungry.”

Malkin’s injury, for what it’s worth, didn’t happen during the Stamkos fight, he said. It occurred on a hard open-ice hit delivered by Dan Girardi earlier in the game.

“It’s a tough game, and we battle hard,” Malkin said. “Doctor gave me pain pills after the first period. It’s a little bit help to me. Always when you play, you don’t feel it. Worse pain is the next morning, the next day. I feel all right after the hit. Next day, I feel so bad. I knew I have something wrong. I go see doctor and a little bit of trouble.”

Malkin only can hope that soon, all his troubles will be behind him.

“I want to play,” Malkin said. “I’m hungry. I do my best and work hard every day. It’s a little bit slow, but I hope I’m back soon.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.