Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin pursues U.S. citizenship, brushes off report of investment gone wrong |

Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin pursues U.S. citizenship, brushes off report of investment gone wrong

Seth Rorabaugh
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penguins forward Evgeni Malkin has been sidelined since Oct. 5 due to injury.

Penguins superstar forward Evgeni Malkin wasn’t terribly busy over the past three weeks.

True, he had the business of rehabilitating an unspecified injury which has sidelined him since Oct. 5, but beyond the visits with team medical staff and the individual skating sessions, life for an injured player can be boring.

So he found a way to bide his time.

He took on the process of becoming a U.S. citizen.

“My child, he has an American passport,” said Malkin, a native of Magnitogorsk, Russia. “It’s my second home. I’m here (13) years. Maybe he go to school. My wife (is) here. I don’t like U.S. fight against Russia. We have rules in Russia. You have two passports. It’s nothing bad. I’m OK about that. My child has two passports. I’m fine.”

The initial report of Malkin pursuing U.S. citizenship came from, a Russian news site, which reported, at length, of Malkin losing approximately $4 million in a blockchain or cryptocurrency startup in his home country. According to the report, his involvement with the startup could present legal issues for Malkin.

Malkin offered something of a dismissal of the report while speaking with Pittsburgh media after practice in Cranberry on Monday.

“No, forget it.” Malkin said. “Garbage. I don’t like that, you know.

“I don’t want like this right now. It’s garbage for me. I knew I’m a good guy. I don’t know what to say about that. A little like bit crazy this morning for me. I know it’s nothing bad for me.”

Follow the Penguins all season long.

Seth Rorabaugh is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Seth by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.