ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin faces possible suspension for stick swing |

Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin faces possible suspension for stick swing

Jonathan Bombulie
| Monday, February 11, 2019 1:30 a.m


PHILADELPHIA — Evgeni Malkin made a positive impact on the Pittsburgh Penguins on Monday night in his return from a five-game absence because of an upper-body injury.

They’ll have to wait to hear from the league to know whether they’ll have him in the lineup again Wednesday night against Edmonton.

Late in the third period of a 4-1 victory, Malkin was given a match penalty for swinging his stick at the head of Flyers forward Michael Raffl.

He will have a hearing Tuesday with the NHL’s department of player safety.

The pair was engaged in a battle in front of the benches when Raffl threw a gloved punch to the back of Malkin’s head. The Penguins center responded with a baseball swing that did not appear to make contact with Raffl.

“I don’t know. He just dived,” Malkin said. “Referee gave me five minutes. Nothing injured. Not bleeding. Nothing. I don’t know. I know I give them five-minute power play. It’s my fault for sure. Play smart next time.”

Match penalties are automatically reviewed by the league office.

“I just think on Geno’s part, it was reactionary,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “He was getting punched in the back of the head. It was a battle between the two of them. I think it was reactionary. I was a little surprised it was a match (penalty) because the player didn’t get hurt on it or there wasn’t real significant contact, but that’s not how the referee saw it.”

Penalty aside, Malkin had an effective night for the Penguins. He had four shots on goal and won 56 percent of his faceoffs in about 16 minutes of ice time.

About seven minutes into the second period, Malkin knocked down a bouncing puck Phil Kessel had nudged into the neutral zone and left a drop pass for Nick Bjugstad at the top of the left faceoff circle. Bjugstad’s shot beat goalie Carter Hart blocker side to give the Penguins a 2-0 lead.

“Pretty normal. Pretty good,” Malkin said when asked how he felt. “Always a little bit nervous when you get back, first game, but we play against Philly. Great team. They win the last eight, nine games. We understand they play good right now at home.

“I think we did a great job. Maybe we were not great second period. We gave them so many chances. We need to push back. I think we need to control more pucks and we need to control play in the offensive zone. It’s like a playoff game for us. It doesn’t matter. We take the two points. Our goalie and PK did a great job tonight for sure.”

Malkin and his linemates, Kessel and Bjugstad, were the only Penguins forwards with shot-attempt stats in the black in the game.

“You can see how dangerous they can be when they have the puck,” Sullivan said. “They made a couple of plays. They had a handful of Grade-A scoring chances. Nick in particular. Nick had three of them himself. One of them he scores on. They have the potential to be a real dynamic line offensively. I think what Nick adds to Geno and Phil is he’s a center iceman, so he has a comfort level playing down low and he can take faceoffs being a right-handed shot.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at or via Twitter .

Pittsburgh Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin in action during an NHL hockey game against the Philadelphia Flyers, Monday, Feb. 11, 2019, in Philadelphia.
Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.