Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin to meet Flyers for first time since stick-swinging suspension |

Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin to meet Flyers for first time since stick-swinging suspension

Jonathan Bombulie
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin (71) leans on the boards in front of his bench after Philadelphia Flyers’ Jakub Voracek scored an empty-net goal during the third period to cap a 4-2 Flyers win in an NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Saturday, Dec. 1, 2018.

PHILADELPHIA – In the old days of the rivalry between the Pittsburgh Penguins and Philadelphia Flyers, there’s little doubt Evgeni Malkin would have been starting off Saturday’s Stadium Series game with a fight.

These days, it’s no sure thing.

The last time the teams met Feb. 11 at Wells Fargo Center, Malkin received a match penalty for swinging his stick at the head of Flyers forward Michael Raffl. Malkin, who acted in retaliation after Raffl punched him in the back of the head, received a one-game suspension.

With the NHL’s revenge culture growing less pronounced in recent years, bad blood might carry over, but it might not.

“I think it’s like that whenever we play these guys,” winger Jake Guentzel said. “You know it’s going to be physical. It’s a big two points. We both need these points right now. It’s going to be that type of game, I think.”

Malkin didn’t do interviews after Friday’s practice.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.