ShareThis Page
Penguins expect physical fireworks in matchup with Lightning |

Penguins expect physical fireworks in matchup with Lightning

Jonathan Bombulie
Tampa Bay Lightning’s Ryan McDonagh (27) checks Pittsburgh Penguins’ Patric Hornqvist (72) to the ice during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019.

TAMPA, Fla. – The last time the Pittsburgh Penguins met the Tampa Bay Lightning, on Jan. 30 at PPG Paints Arena, it was reasonable to expect a high-flying showdown between two of the NHL’s most skilled offenses.

Instead, it got a little nasty.

Cedric Paquette leveled Kris Letang with a late hit early in the game. Evgeni Malkin fought Steven Stamkos late. Scrums developed after the whistle more often than not.

Letang wasn’t surprised.

“They have a mix of both,” he said. “Their third and fourth line brings a lot of speed and energy and physicality. I was expecting it. They have big defensemen also. It’s what they do.”

Winger Bryan Rust said he thinks previous playoff meetings between the teams have given birth to a bit of a rivalry.

“It definitely got a little bit chippy,” he said. “I think that might have something to do with the history between these two teams. There have been some playoff series and some times where games get close and tight. I think anytime that happens in recent history, things boil over to the following seasons.”

Given the construction of their roster, the Penguins clearly don’t specialize in physical play. Still, they tend to turn in some of their finer performances against aggressive opponents. Meetings with Washington, Winnipeg and Tampa Bay this season are evidence.

“I think it just fires everyone up a little more, gets the competitive juices flowing a little more,” Rust said. “Guys get riled up and once it happens to one or two guys, it’s contagious throughout the bench.”

Coach Mike Sullivan said he’s fine with that, as long as the Penguins don’t forget who they are.

“Teams are going to try to play us different ways,” Sullivan said. “Sometimes teams are going to try to use aggression to beat us, and that’s OK. The most important thing is understanding what our game is and how we have to play in order to be successful. We can’t get lured into someone else’s game. When we do that, when we have that focus and that diligence and that discipline, that’s when I think our team’s at its best.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.