Penguins face serious first-round test in ‘stingy’ Islanders |

Penguins face serious first-round test in ‘stingy’ Islanders

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins celebrate Kris Letang’s goal against the Islanders in the first period Thursday, Dec. 6, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

Moments after their regular season ended with a 4-3 overtime loss to the New York Rangers on Saturday night, the Pittsburgh Penguins immediately turned their attention to a more pressing matter.

How are they going to score enough goals to beat the New York Islanders in the first round of the playoffs?

The Penguins earned a date with the second-place Islanders by securing third place in the Metropolitan Division with the point they were awarded for Saturday night’s overtime loss.

The upstart Islanders lost John Tavares in free agency in July but finished three points ahead of the Penguins in the regular season thanks to a resurgent defense under first-year coach Barry Trotz. They went from the worst defense in the league, allowing 3.57 goals per game last season, to the best in the league this year, allowing 2.36 per game.

Goalies Robin Lehner and Thomas Greiss both finished in the top five in the league in save percentage.

“They’re a very stingy team defensively,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “They’re tight checking. They’re one of the better teams in the league as far as goals against, and that’s been their identity this year. (It) has been a defense-first mindset and they’re a team that’s hard to play against.

“We’re going to have to make sure we have an element of patience with our game. We’ve got to take what they give us. We’re going to have to compete every bit as hard. We’re going to have to make sure we have a discipline to our game, that we play within some structure.”

The Penguins and Islanders split four regular-season meetings in a series that wrapped up by Dec. 10. Each team won once in a shootout. The Penguins held a slim 12-11 lead in aggregate scoring.

“The type of hockey they play is a playoff style. It’s tight,” Sidney Crosby said. “They don’t give up a lot. You look at the games we played against them. You’ve got to earn the space that you create out there. I think they’re defensive-minded, but they can score, too. They have depth. It’ll be a good challenge for us, but it’s the best time of year. We’ve played some good hockey here moving into the playoffs, so that’s something we can feel good about and feel confident.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.