ShareThis Page
Penguins head into break with nagging inconsistencies | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins head into break with nagging inconsistencies

Jonathan Bombulie
| Sunday, January 20, 2019 9:00 a.m
658566_web1_658566-3e0a0859cd254d718cd96aa855648858
AP
The Vegas Golden Knights celebrate a goal against Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith (1) during the second period of an NHL hockey game Saturday, Jan. 19, 2019, in Las Vegas.

As they watched goalie Casey DeSmith try to fend off breakaway after breakaway throughout a 7-3 loss to the Vegas Golden Knights on Saturday night, the Pittsburgh Penguins were faced with a harsh reality.

It’s not that they’re a bumbling bunch whose championship window is closing. That’s way too dramatic.

The .604 winning percentage they’ve managed through the first 48 games of the season is a perfectly fine pace to get them into the playoffs relatively comfortably.

No, the harsh reality is that they’re a team capable of transitioning from an eight-game winning streak to a 2-3-0 western road trip in a matter of days.

They’re capable of erasing a 3-1 deficit like it’s nothing, like they did in the second period against Vegas, then immediately following that up by allowing four unanswered goals.

Consistency is the hallmark of a Cup-caliber club, and the Penguins sure haven’t found it yet this season.

“We’ve got to make sure that we play a brand of hockey that’s playoff ready that gives us a chance to win night in and night out,” coach Mike Sullivan said.

After the loss, the Penguins were set to scatter across North America for a week-long midseason break.

Sullivan said he wants his team to enjoy the time off.

“I think it will be good for all of us to get away from the game a little bit,” he said.

He also said he expects to see playoff-caliber consistency when the break is over.

“When we come back, we’ve got to be focused and determined on playing our best hockey,” Sullivan said. “The most important thing from my standpoint, and this is what I said to them after the game, is that we have to find a way to become a team that has a clear identity of what it is and how we’re going to play and then everybody’s got to buy into it. Everyone, to a man, has got to buy into it.”

Here are three things we learned from Saturday night’s game.

1. Turning point

It wasn’t hard to pick out the turning point. With the score tied 3-3 in the second period, an Evgeni Malkin power-play goal was waved off when he kicked the puck into the net. Seconds later, Marc-Andre Fleury did the splits to stop a Phil Kessel backdoor chance.

Minutes after that, a stickhandling misadventure by DeSmith led to a Jonathan Marchessault goal that gave the Golden Knights the lead for good.

In general, Fleury was excellent as he made 34 saves to improve to 2-1 against his old team. DeSmith made some remarkable stops among his 28 saves, including four on breakaways, but the Marchessault goal was a killer. He’s dropped three straight starts.

2. Scheduled loss

Saturday night’s game may have been the most difficult circumstances the Penguins will face all season.

They were playing on consecutive nights after flying in from Arizona while the Golden Knights had been off since Tuesday. On top of that, their last game before a long break was played in the most distracting city in the league.

Human nature suggests they would lack focus, and they did.

3. Middle-six woes

Sullivan continued to shuffle up personnel on the second and third lines. Kessel spent most of the game in an unfamiliar position on the left wing with Evgeni Malkin and Patric Hornqvist. Dominik Simon and Bryan Rust swapped places midgame.

There was nothing wrong with the changes in a vacuum. Kessel and Simon both scored goals. In the big picture, though, they show the Penguins have found no consistency in the middle six.

Whether the answers are found internally or externally before the Feb. 25 trade deadline, they need to get the puzzle pieces to fit together better.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.


Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.


Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.