Penguins’ Jack Johnson practices fully, will be ‘fine’ vs. Lightning |

Penguins’ Jack Johnson practices fully, will be ‘fine’ vs. Lightning

Chris Adamski

The Pittsburgh Penguins lost two defensemen in a six-hour span Monday. Luckily for them, the loss of one was temporary.

Jack Johnson practiced fully at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex on Tuesday after he left Monday night’s game during third period because of an unspecified injury.

“I feel OK,” Johnson said after practice. “I’ll be fine (Wednesday) night.”

The Penguins host the team with the league’s best record, the Tampa Bay Lightning, on Wednesday.

“He’s a tough kid, he plays through a lot, and so from that standpoint it doesn’t surprise me that Jack practiced today,” coach Mike Sullivan said Tuesday. “He responded pretty well, so that is certainly encouraging.”

Before Monday’s game, the Penguins traded Jamie Oleksiak to the Dallas Stars for a fourth-round pick, clearing space on a blue line that had eight healthy NHL defenseman and a ninth, Justin Schultz, nearing a return from a broken leg suffered in October.

All players on the active roster took part in Tuesday’s practice; injured-reserve players Schultz and forward Zach Aston-Reese skated on their own before the workout.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.