Penguins’ Jared McCann ‘optimistic’ about returning for Game 3 |

Penguins’ Jared McCann ‘optimistic’ about returning for Game 3

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Jared McCann during practice Saturday, April 13, 2019 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.

It took four seasons for Jared McCann to play in his first career postseason game. Nobody took it harder than McCann when his experience was blunted after one game because of an upper body injury.

McCann was scratched from Game 2 of the Pittsburgh Penguins’ first-round playoff series against the New York Islanders, but he returned to practice Saturday afternoon and participated in the abbreviated 20-minute session at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.

“I’m feeling really good,” McCann said. “The last day there didn’t feel great, and I wasn’t comfortable. Today is a different story. I feel good, and we’ll see where we go from there.”

McCann said he is “optimistic” about returning for Game 3 on Sunday at PPG Paints Arena. Coach Mike Sullivan said McCann had an “encouraging day” of practice.

McCann alternated with Zach Aston-Reese while skating on a second line with Evgeni Malkin and Phil Kessel. Since joining the Penguins on Feb. 1, he had 11 goals and 17 points in 32 games.

In his playoff debut, McCann took three shots and had 17 minutes, 5 seconds off ice time. He absorbed a hit from Cal Clutterbuck but finished the game. However, he was scratched after not participating in warmups prior to Game 2.

“It’s definitely frustrating,” he said. “I wanted to be out there to help my team. To not be able to do that really (stunk). I’m looking to play tomorrow.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.