ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Justin Schultz, Zach Aston-Reese still week to week with injuries |

Penguins’ Justin Schultz, Zach Aston-Reese still week to week with injuries

Jonathan Bombulie
| Sunday, January 27, 2019 6:02 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Justin Schultz looks to pass the puck during their game against the Capitals inside of PPG Paints Arena on May 3, 2018.

The Pittsburgh Penguins returned from a weeklong midseason break missing four players from practice Sunday afternoon in Cranberry.

Sidney Crosby and Kris Letang had the day off because they represented the team at the NHL All-Star Game in San Jose the night before.

Justin Schultz and Zach Aston-Reese skated with skills coach Ty Hennes before practice, but they are not yet ready to rejoin the group.

Schultz has been out since Oct. 13 with a broken left leg. Aston-Reese has been out since Jan. 8 with a hand injury.

Coach Mike Sullivan said he’s pleased with the progress they’re making, though he still considers both week to week rather than day to day.

“We don’t have any specific dates at this point in mind, but we do know they’re approaching joining the team here, which is encouraging,” Sullivan said.

Schultz’s return will give the Penguins nine healthy defensemen on the roster, which is a logjam that general manager Jim Rutherford will have to take some steps to alleviate.

Up front, the Penguins are operating with the minimum of 12 healthy forwards at the moment. Any further injuries will require a call-up from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.