Penguins’ Matt Murray puts late-game woes behind him with strong showing in Dallas |

Penguins’ Matt Murray puts late-game woes behind him with strong showing in Dallas

Jonathan Bombulie
Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Matt Murray (30) defends the goal during the first period of an NHL hockey game against the Dallas Stars in Dallas, Saturday, March 23, 2019.

DALLAS – While he was stuck in a stretch where he gave up the tying goal in the final five minutes of regulation four times in 13 games, it seemed tone deaf to point out how well Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Matt Murray was playing.

Yeah, his save percentage is great and all, but what about these back-breaking goals he’s surrendering?

The “but” in that sentence was so big, Sir Mix-A-Lot could have written a song about it.

After Murray’s performance in a 3-2 Penguins win over the Dallas Stars on Saturday night, though, the mood is beginning to change.

A mention of how well Murray is playing lately no longer seems out of place. It’s a mere recitation of facts.

Since returning from a lower-body injury Dec. 15, Murray is 22-7-4 with a .930 save percentage that ranks sixth in the league.

Counter to visual evidence to the contrary in recent days, he’s been downright outstanding during that same span while protecting a one-goal lead as well. His .941 save percentage while his team is up one is fifth-best in the league.

“I think Matt’s playing his best hockey of the year,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “There’s no doubt. I can just see it in his body language from the bench. He’s big as a house. You don’t see any net. He’s reading plays well. He’s anticipating. He’s squaring up to the puck. His rebound control is terrific. And he’s competing. He’s competing hard. When he’s playing the way he’s playing, he’s one of the top goaltenders in the league in my mind.”

Murray’s challenge Saturday night was a stiff one. The Stars are hanging onto one of the two wild-card playoff berths in the Western Conference, so each time they fell behind by a goal, they threw everything they had at Murray.

They succeeded in finding an equalizer the first two times the Penguins went up by a goal. The third time, Murray made sure they failed.

“They’ve got a lot of big guys, guys that are really good at the net front with good hands,” Murray said. “You’ve got a hard night. They go hard. They get a lot of tips and screens and second-chance opportunities. They made it a hard night for us, for sure.”

The only place Saturday night’s hard-fought Penguins win might have played better than it did in Pittsburgh was in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

That’s where Murray and Jared McCann were junior hockey teammates with the OHL’s Greyhounds.

McCann scored twice, including a highlight-reel backhand spin-o-rama in the third period, to give Murray all the run support he needed.

“He’s sick,” Murray said. “I knew it for a long time. He was lighting up the OHL when we played together. I was excited when we traded for him. He’s a good friend of mine. I know how skilled he is. He’s showing it right now. He’s a really good goal scorer, and he’s doing such a good job for us.”

McCann, naturally, returned the compliment.

“I feel like he doesn’t get the recognition sometimes that he deserves,” McCann said. “I’ve been able to play with him for quite a few years here, and even in the Soo, it was the same thing. He was just unbelievable. He’s obviously going to be one of the best goalies in the league for years to come.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.