Penguins notebook: Garrett Wilson’s ‘greasy’ goal a bright spot |

Penguins notebook: Garrett Wilson’s ‘greasy’ goal a bright spot

Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Penguins’ Garrett Wilson gets a score against Islanders’ goalie Robin Lehner during the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Sunday, April 14, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Penguins’ players Dominik Simon, Matt Cullen and Garrett Wilson celebrate a goal scored by Wilson against the Islanders during the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Sunday, April 14, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins celebrate Garrett Wilson’s goal against the Islanders in the first period Sunday, April 14, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

In one sense, the fact Garrett Wilson scored the team’s lone goal in Game 3 against the New York Islanders on Sunday is a bad sign for the Pittsburgh Penguins.

Couple that with Erik Gudbranson being the only scorer in a 3-1 loss in Game 2 of their Eastern Conference first-round series, and the Penguins have gone two full games without getting a goal from someone on their roster who usually specializes in such tasks.

In another sense, though, the goals by Wilson and Gudbranson give the Penguins a blueprint to follow as they make a last-gasp attempt to get into the series in Game 4.

Wilson’s goal was a tip. Gudbranson’s came on a screen. In the absence of that type of play, Islanders goalie Robin Lehner is very difficult to beat.

“He’s a big goalie. He takes away a lot of the lower part of the net,” Wilson said. “They’ve got a lot of guys that are blocking shots. They defend well. They defend hard. We’ve just got to find a way to get the greasy goals.”


Kuhnhackl’s contribution

After three seasons and two Stanley Cup championships, Tom Kuhnhackl knows plenty about his former Penguins teammates and what they had planned for Game 3.

“We obviously knew they were going to come out hard,” Kuhnhackl said. “They were going to push the first 10 minutes of the game, which they did. They scored that goal, but we stuck to our gameplan. We have to make them play a 200-foot game, play physical, finish our hits on them.”


Winter is coming

Islanders forward Cal Clutterbuck knows Game 4 against the Penguins won’t be easy even with a 3-0 lead, but he planned to relax Sunday night.

“We’re just going to try and go back to the hotel and maybe catch the ‘Game of Thrones’ premiere tonight,” he said, “and we’ll think about Tuesday (on Monday) morning.”


Lineup change

The Penguins made one last-minute lineup change for Game 3. Jared McCann, who missed Game 2 with an upper-body injury, was inserted for Teddy Blueger just before faceoff. McCann had two shots in about 14 minutes of ice time.

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.