ShareThis Page
Penguins place Olli Maatta on injured reserve |

Penguins place Olli Maatta on injured reserve

Joe Rutter
| Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:59 p.m
Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Olli Maatta (3) and Florida Panthers left wing Mike Hoffman (68) go for the puck during the third period of an NHL hockey game, Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019, in Sunrise, Fla. The Panthers won 3-2 in overtime.

The Pittsburgh Penguins will be without defenseman Olli Maatta for an undetermined amount of time after the team placed him on injured reserve Tuesday afternoon.

Maatta, 24, sustained an upper-body injury after taking a hit Monday night in the Penguins’ 4-1 victory in Philadelphia. Maatta left the ice favoring his left arm in the first period after taking a hit from the Flyers’ Phil Varone.

Maatta has appeared in 55 games this season, accmulating one goal, 12 assists and a plus-7 rating.

In the short term, the Penguins are equipped to handle Maata’s absence. Justin Schultz, out since Oct. 13 with a broken leg, is nearly ready to step back into the lineup. Chad Ruhwedel remains on hand as an extra.

In the big picture, general manager Jim Rutherford might need to enter the defenseman trade market before the Feb. 25 deadline. Adding a veteran on an expiring contract — think the Ron Hainsey move when Kris Letang was injured in 2017 — would make sense.

The Penguins have 26 games remaining in their regular season. They return home and will play the Edmonton Oilers on Wednesday night at PPG Paints Arena. Faceoff is 8 p.m.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.