ShareThis Page
Penguins place Zach Aston-Reese on injured reserve |

Penguins place Zach Aston-Reese on injured reserve

Jonathan Bombulie
| Wednesday, January 9, 2019 1:30 a.m

Pittsburgh Penguins winger Zach Aston-Reese will miss at least a week and likely more with an injury suffered during a 5-1 win over Florida on Tuesday night.

The Penguins put Aston-Reese on injured reserve Wednesday after he was injured in a third-period fight with Colton Sceviour. The IR designation means he’ll be sidelined at least a week.

The Penguins called up Garrett Wilson from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton of the AHL to take his place on the roster.

A physical left wing, Wilson has two assists in 14 NHL games this season. At the AHL level, he has 18 points in 18 games.

The loss of Aston-Reese is a significant one for the Penguins. He’s been an effective player on the fourth line and on the penalty kill. He has two goals and two assists in his past four games.

Winger Patric Hornqvist was also injured in Tuesday’s game, leaving after taking a puck to the face in the first period, but he was not placed on the IR.

If Hornqvist is unable to play Friday in Anaheim, Derek Grant would likely take his spot in the lineup. Grant was a healthy scratch Tuesday.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.