Penguins podcast: Previewing Predators and a look at playoff prospects | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Penguins podcast: Previewing Predators and a look at playoff prospects

Tim Benz
950586_web1_AP_19081192273055
AP
Pittsburgh Penguins center Sidney Crosby (87) is defended by Nashville Predators center Colton Sissons in the first period of an NHL hockey game Thursday, March 21, 2019, in Nashville, Tenn.

Penguins beat writer Jonathan Bombulie joins me on our Sided.co podcast. We preview the Penguins’ game Friday against Nashville.

We also talk about the injuries to Kris Letang and Evgeni Malkin, the roster decisions that will follow their return and some NHL rules debates that may be similar to those in the NFL.

Plus, we start looking ahead to some potential playoff scenarios for the Penguins.


LISTEN: Previewing Penguins-Predators, playoff prospects


Most importantly, we have an in-depth examination of chicken and biscuits, particularly focusing on the proper spreads for those biscuits.

If you say anything but honey butter, we are going to have a problem.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.