Penguins scratch Alex Galchenyuk for precautionary reasons |

Penguins scratch Alex Galchenyuk for precautionary reasons

Seth Rorabaugh
The Penguins acquired forwar Alex Galchenyuk this past offseason in a trade with the Arizona Coyotes.

Penguins forward Alex Galchenyuk was held out of a 4-2 preseason victory against the Detroit Red Wings on Wednesday due to an undisclosed injury according to head coach Mike Sullivan.

The Penguins scratched Galchenyuk for precautionary reasons per Sullivan, who characterized the ailment as “nagging.”

The primary return in an offseason trade which sent star forward Phil Kessel to the Arizona Coyotes, Galchenyuk participated in the morning skate and was teamed on a line with Evgeni Malkin and Bryan Rust. Dominik Kahun replaced Galchenyuk on the line during the game.

Kahun had 14 minutes, 37 seconds of ice time on 19 shifts and one shot.

Galchenyuk is expected to begin the season on Malkin’s left wing. During his lone preseason game to date, he scored a power-play goal during a 4-1 home win against the Columbus Blue Jackets on Sept. 19.

Follow the Penguins all season long.

Seth Rorabaugh is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Seth by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.