Penguins settling into stable line combinations down the stretch | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins settling into stable line combinations down the stretch

Jonathan Bombulie
952417_web1_1138291274
Getty
Penguins coach Mike Sullivan works the bench against the New York Rangers at Madison Square Garden on March 25, 2019.

While injuries have caused a shuffle on the Pittsburgh Penguins blue line in recent days, the combinations up front have been remarkably stable.

In fact, with five games left in the regular season, it’s not hard to project the line combinations coach Mike Sullivan will use in the playoffs.

The top-line trio of Jake Guentzel, Sidney Crosby and Bryan Rust seems set. Ditto for the third-line combination of Dominik Simon, Nick Bjugstad and Patric Hornqvist.

At the moment, the second line has Teddy Blueger centering Jared McCann and Phil Kessel. When Evgeni Malkin returns from an upper-body injury, he’ll likely slot into the middle of that line, leaving Blueger, Matt Cullen and Garrett Wilson on the fourth.

When Zach Aston-Reese returns from a lower-body injury, he’ll more than likely replace Wilson.

“We’ve had a lot of stability with the lines recently, over the last three or four weeks,” Sullivan said. “Certainly, it helps them to build some chemistry. Ideally, we’d like to try to settle into combinations. I think we’ve had consistent tandems most of the year, but we’ve moved that third guy around depending on injuries or who’s playing well or what the needs are or whatever it may be.

“I wouldn’t say that we’re completely set right now because we have some key players that aren’t in the lineup, but for the most part, we’ve been pretty stable.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.