ShareThis Page
Penguins shelve outrage over Evgeni Malkin suspension |

Penguins shelve outrage over Evgeni Malkin suspension

Jonathan Bombulie
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Evgeni Malkin (71) gets off a pass as he falls to the ice with Detroit Red Wings’ Christoffer Ehn (70) defending during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Thursday, Dec. 27, 2018.

The way Kris Letang sees it, “screaming in the media” wouldn’t put Evgeni Malkin back in the Pittsburgh Penguins lineup against the Edmonton Oilers on Wednesday night.

So he didn’t.

And neither did any of his teammates.

Reaction was largely muted to the news that Malkin would have to serve a one-game suspension for swinging his stick at the head of Philadelphia Flyers forward Michael Raffl on Monday night.

“I didn’t really have a reaction,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “The league makes the decisions and it doesn’t really matter what I think or you think or the rest of us think. The league makes their decisions and we’re going to live by it.”

In a perfect world, captain Sidney Crosby said, Malkin would have retaliated to a gloved punch he took in the back of the head from Raffl in a different way, but he knows that’s not always possible.

“It’s an emotional game,” Crosby said. “You’re going to do stuff sometimes. Ideally you wouldn’t do anything but skate away, but I’m sure there are a lot of guys, myself included, that have said that a number of times and it doesn’t always work out that way.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.