Penguins show faith in rookie Teddy Blueger after injury to Evgeni Malkin |

Penguins show faith in rookie Teddy Blueger after injury to Evgeni Malkin

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Teddy Blueger looks on as the puck hits off the cross bar behind Red Wings goaltender Harri Sateri in the first period Sunday, Sept. 23, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

RALEIGH, N.C. – Due to the ability of in-season acquisitions Jared McCann and Nick Bjugstad to play multiple positions up and down the lineup, Pittsburgh Penguins coach Mike Sullivan had a plethora of options to choose from when figuring out how to replace injured center Evgeni Malkin.

He decided to bank on Teddy Blueger.

The 24-year-old rookie centered the second line with wingers Bryan Rust and Phil Kessel in the team’s first game without Malkin on Sunday, and the trio remained intact as the Penguins took morning skate in preparation for a critical game Tuesday night against the Carolina Hurricanes.

The third-place Penguins have a three-point lead on the fourth-place Hurricanes in the Metropolitan Division standings, but Carolina has two games in hand. The teams will meet again March 31 at PPG Paints Arena.

Matt Murray will start in goal Tuesday night for the Penguins. For his career, he’s 4-0-0 with a .976 save percentage in Raleigh.

The second-line decision showed faith in Blueger, who has four goals in 19 games this season and has demonstrated an NHL-caliber two-way game.

“He’s played really well and he’s earned it,” center Matt Cullen said. “It’s good to see him getting that opportunity. I thought last game, he was really good. Obviously with Geno out, we need him to fill that role. I’ve been impressed with his game. He’s fought his way and earned his way through.”

It also shows that Sullivan did not want to disrupt his first and third lines.

Sidney Crosby, Jake Guentzel and McCann have shown significant offensive chemistry in the past few weeks. Dominik Simon, Patric Hornqvist and Bjugstad have formed the team’s most effective possession line.

Sullivan said he would keep a close eye on the combination of Rust, Blueger and Kessel to see how things are going, but he thinks it’s a trio that shows potential.

“With Teddy and Rusty, we’ve got speed on the line,” Sullivan said. “We’ve got two conscientious players that play a 200-foot game. They’re good at getting in on the forecheck and forcing turnovers. Hopefully, with Phil’s offensive instincts, that line could work for us as far as generating offense but also being a line that has a sound defensive conscience as well.”

As for Blueger, he said he’s trying to take his promotion from the fourth line in stride.

“I try not to think of it like that,” he said. “You just go into each game and focus on playing your best, doing your best, getting better and helping the team win. Obviously we hope (Malkin will) be back soon. He’s a big part of this team.”

Blueger said he thought the line was effective against Philadelphia on Sunday, and that he is growing more comfortable the more he plays with high-end offensive talents like Malkin and Kessel.

“It’s been a lot of fun,” Blueger said. “Those guys are so creative and so smart. The passes they make are so unorthodox, you could say. Just try to give them the puck and open up some room for them as best as I can.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.