Penguins’ Sidney Crosby named finalist for Hart Trophy |

Penguins’ Sidney Crosby named finalist for Hart Trophy

Pittsburgh Penguins center Sidney Crosby waits for a faceoff against New York Islanders center Casey Cizikas during the first period of Game 1 of a their first-round playoff series Wednesday, April 10, 2019, in Uniondale, N.Y.
Pittsburgh Penguins’ Sidney Crosby (87) holds off New York Islanders’ Devon Toews (25) during a second period power play in Game 3 of an NHL first-round hockey playoff series in Pittsburgh, Sunday, April 14, 2019. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

At 31, Sidney Crosby isn’t slowing down.

The Pittsburgh Penguins captain’s status among the NHL’s elite was proven again Sunday, when he was named a finalist for the Hart Trophy, which goes to the player judged most valuable to his team.

The Tampa Bay Lightning’s Nikita Kucherov, 25, and the Edmonton Oilers’ Connor McDavid, 22, are the other finalists. The winner will be announced at the NHL Awards Show on June 19 in Las Vegas.

Crosby is trying to become the first player to win the Hart after starting a season 30 or older since Colorado’s Joe Sakic in 2000-01.

Crosby, who won the Hart in 2007 and ‘14, had 35 goals and 65 assists this season, tying for fifth in the NHL with 100 points. He led the team in assists and points. The Penguins’ season ended with a first-round sweep against the New York Islanders.

Crosby is a Hart finalist for the third time in the past four seasons and seventh time as a finalist overall. He is the only active player with six seasons of 100 or more points.

Mario Lemieux (1988, ‘93, ‘96) is the only three-time Hart winner in Penguins history.

Kucherov led the NHL with 128 points on 41 goals and 87 assists. McDavid, the 2017 Hart Trophy winner, was second in points, finishing with 116 on 41 goals and 75 assists.

The New Jersey Devils’ Taylor Hall won the award last season.

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.