ShareThis Page
Penguins’ Teddy Blueger, Garrett Wilson on track to stay in lineup |

Penguins’ Teddy Blueger, Garrett Wilson on track to stay in lineup

Jonathan Bombulie

With Evgeni Malkin returning from a one-game suspension and Zach Aston-Reese back from a hand injury, the Pittsburgh Penguins have as large a crop of available forwards as they’ve had at any point in the season.

That means tough decisions for coach Mike Sullivan when the Penguins host Calgary on Saturday afternoon.

At Friday’s practice in Cranberry, Dominik Simon and Tanner Pearson were on the outside looking in while Teddy Blueger and Garrett Wilson had spots among the team’s top 12 forwards.

That could change by the time the puck drops Saturday afternoon of course, but if it doesn’t, Sullivan is giving two less experienced players a chance to make an impact.

Blueger has played only seven NHL games, scoring in three of them. Wilson has 62 games on his NHL resume.

Pearson is a sixth-year pro with a 24-goal season to his credit. Simon has played 81 games over the past two years.

“(Experience has) never been part of the criteria I’ve ever used,” Sullivan said. “We’re going to put players in the lineup that we think can play well and help us win that bring a certain dimension to the team that helps us win. That’s the dialogue that we have as a coaching staff. That’s how I frame the discussion when we discuss those kind of decisions. That’s quite honestly how we go about our business.”

Simon and Pearson are slumping. Simon has scored once in his last 15 games and was scratched Wednesday against Edmonton. Pearson has one goal in his last 13 games.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.