Penguins turn tables with shorthanded scoring spree | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins turn tables with shorthanded scoring spree

Jonathan Bombulie
934606_web1_1138285682
Getty
Teddy Blueger (53) of the Pittsburgh Penguins scores a shorthanded goal at 13:12 of the second period against Alexandar Georgiev of the New York Rangers at Madison Square Garden on March 25.

NEW YORK – As the Pittsburgh Penguins gave up shorthanded goal after shorthanded goal throughout much of this season, the players who regularly kill penalties for the team must have been watching closely from the bench.

These days, the Penguins are the ones scoring the back-breaking shorthanded goals, not allowing them.

Teddy Blueger scored a critical goal on a second-period penalty kill to lead the Penguins to a 5-2 victory over the New York Rangers on Monday night.

That came on the heels of Jared McCann’s shorthanded spin-o-rama in a 3-2 victory at Dallas on Saturday.

The Penguins have scored six shorthanded goals in their last 24 games. They rank third in the league with 12 this season.

On Blueger’s goal, a bouncing puck got past Rangers point man Kevin Shattenkirk to start a two-on-one the other way. Blueger’s pass for Bryan Rust misfired, but the duo stuck with it behind the net. Rust passed to Blueger, who stepped out in front of the left post and backhanded a shot past goalie Alexandar Georgiev.

It was the first shorthanded goal of Blueger’s career, though he downplayed that achievement afterwards.

“Any goal feels great, to be honest,” Blueger said. “It’s not like I scored and I was like, ‘Oh, wow, that’s shorthanded.’”

The Penguins scored six shorthanded goals all of last season, but it’s not hard to figure out why they’ve doubled their output this year.

Last season, the four forwards who spent the most time on the penalty kill were Riley Sheahan, Carl Hagelin, Carter Rowney and Tom Kuhnhackl. They’re solid, two-way players, but not exactly offensive dynamos.

This year, Jared McCann, Matt Cullen, Rust, Blueger, Jake Guentzel and Zach Aston-Reese are among the Penguins players to score shorthanded. They’re a much more offensively talented bunch.

“We really don’t coach the penalty kill to score goals. We coach the penalty kill to defend and keep it out of our net,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “When you look at the personnel that we have that we’re utilizing killing penalties right now, they’re guys that have offensive instincts, so they have the ability to take advantage of situations on the ice that may present themselves through their defense. I think that’s the biggest difference.

“Rusty has a ton of speed. If he can get to a loose puck, he can potentially create a breakaway or an odd-man rush. The other guys all have great offensive instincts and have the ability to finish. That’s probably the biggest difference. As a coaching staff, we haven’t changed the way we’re trying to coach the group as a whole. I think a lot of it is just personnel based.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.