Penguins’ Zach Aston-Reese files for salary arbitration |

Penguins’ Zach Aston-Reese files for salary arbitration

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Zach Aston-Reese clears the zone during a penalty kill in the second period Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at PPG Paints Arena.

Pittsburgh Penguins winger Zach Aston-Reese was the only one of the team’s four remaining restricted free agents to file for salary arbitration by Friday’s 5 p.m. deadline.

Forwards Teddy Blueger and Adam Johnson elected not to file. Defenseman Marcus Pettersson did not have enough service time to earn the right to arbitration.

Aston-Reese, 24, had eight goals and 17 points in 43 games for the Penguins last season, playing on a contract worth $925,000 annually. According to’s projections, Aston-Reese is in line to make about $1.3 million next season.

Arbitration hearings are scheduled for July 20 through Aug. 4 in Toronto. In the vast majority of cases, the player and team settle on a compromise before the hearing takes place. Last year, 40 of 44 arbitration cases were settled before the hearing.

When a player doesn’t file for arbitration, like Blueger and Johnson didn’t, it usually indicates the qualifying offer they received from the club in June is in the neighborhood of the contract they’d be willing to accept.

According to the website’s projections, Blueger is in line for a raise from $650,000 to $892,390 while Johnson can expect a pay cut from $925,000 to $743,261.

Pettersson is projected to make $1.63 million, but that would be on a short-term deal. If the Penguins want to work out a longer extension that stretches into his unrestricted free agent years, they can expect to pay significantly more in annual salary.

The Penguins are about $2.3 million under the $81.5 million salary cap with 11 forwards, seven defensemen and two goalies under contract.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all offseason long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review assistant sports editor. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.