ShareThis Page

Reports: Former Penguins defenseman Zarley Zalapski dies

Jonathan Bombulie
| Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2017, 3:42 p.m.
Penguins Barry Pederson (10) and Zarley Zalapski (33) combine efforts and sticks to stop new York Ranger Brian Leetch (2) at Madison Square Garden in New York, Feb. 15, 1990.   (AP Photo/Ron Frehm)
Penguins Barry Pederson (10) and Zarley Zalapski (33) combine efforts and sticks to stop new York Ranger Brian Leetch (2) at Madison Square Garden in New York, Feb. 15, 1990. (AP Photo/Ron Frehm)

Former Penguins defenseman Zarley Zalapski has died at the age of 49, according to multiple reports Tuesday. No cause of death was known immediately.

Zalapski was a first-round Penguins draft pick in 1986. Despite playing only parts of four seasons with the team, he ranks 11th in franchise history in defenseman scoring with 33 goals and 135 points in 190 games.

Along with John Cullen and Jeff Parker, Zalapski was sent to the Hartford Whalers in exchange for Ron Francis, Ulf Samuelsson and Grant Jennings in a blockbuster 1991 trade that paved the way for the Penguins' first two Stanley Cup championships.

Zalapski played parts of eight seasons with Hartford, Calgary, Montreal and Philadelphia after leaving the Penguins. He retired in 2010 after playing five seasons in Europe.

“I loved (Pittsburgh),” Zalapski said in a 2011 interview with the Tribune-Review . “I really enjoyed the city, and the people were great. I made a lot of good friends there. That was the worst part about the whole thing, me having to move, was that I wouldn't be able to spend time with the people I made friends with. And then I just really liked the area.

“Out of all the places that I've played, both in Europe and in the NHL, that's still my favorite place.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me