ShareThis Page

Penguins notebook: Winger Dominik Simon fitting in on top line

Jonathan Bombulie
| Friday, Dec. 15, 2017, 6:48 p.m.
The Golden Knights' Marc-Andre Fleury makes a third period save on the Penguins' Dominik Simon on Thursday, Dec. 14, 2017, in Las Vegas.
Getty Images
The Golden Knights' Marc-Andre Fleury makes a third period save on the Penguins' Dominik Simon on Thursday, Dec. 14, 2017, in Las Vegas.
Golden Knights goalie Marc-Andre Fleury blocks a shot by the Penguins' Dominik Simon during the third period Thursday.
Getty Images
Golden Knights goalie Marc-Andre Fleury blocks a shot by the Penguins' Dominik Simon during the third period Thursday.

Mike Sullivan never is shy about shaking up his line combinations, especially when his team is in a scoring slump, so there's no guarantee the trios the team practiced with Friday will last the first period of Saturday's game against Arizona.

While they do stick together, though, there are three players in interesting spots in the lineup.

Dominik Simon remains on the right side of the top line with Sidney Crosby and Jake Guentzel. Since Simon was called up, he has two assists in three games and has the best shot-attempt stats on the team.

“He's really smart,” Crosby said. “He's got good hands. He can make those plays in tight, those little plays, give-and-goes and things like that. I think the biggest thing is his hockey sense and the plays he can make.”

Bryan Rust, a right-handed shot, is playing the left side on the fourth line with Carter Rowney and Ryan Reaves. Rust has found himself in the top six pretty frequently this year, but Sullivan didn't classify putting him on his off wing on the fourth line as a demotion.

“Listen, I love Rusty's game,” Sullivan said. “He can skate. He's an energy guy. He brings our team speed to another level when he's at his best, and we're trying to help him get there.”

Finally, right-handed shooter Patric Hornqvist remains on the left side of the second line with Evgeni Malkin and Phil Kessel. Hornqvist's results in that spot in a 2-1 loss to Vegas on Thursday night were mixed at best.

“It felt fine. That's fine,” Hornqvist said. “We just have to be better as a team and play harder and create more chances up front.”

Study and swagger

Sullivan's recipe Thursday for snapping the Penguins out of a slump that has seen them lose four of their last five games included a delicate balance. He wanted them to study their mistakes in a pre-practice video meeting, but he didn't want them to wallow in their skid.

“We had a film session this morning, trying to … give them clear evidence and why we think the way we think,” Sullivan said. “But I do think the areas we have to continue to improve at, we can. We're capable, and we believe in this group that we have.

“It's important for us right now to stay resilient from an attitude standpoint and make sure we keep some confidence and swagger about us.”

Still shooting

One of the most curious elements of the Penguins' current slump is that even while they've been losing, their shot-based stats have looked fine.

The current skid started with a 4-3 home loss to the Rangers on Dec. 5. Since that night, the Penguins' shot-attempt percentage of 57.1 is tops in the Eastern Conference and second-best in the league.

Shot-attempt percentage is generally considered a strong predictor of future goal-scoring success.

“I think we've played better than our record,” Sullivan said. “There are some encouraging aspects of our game that we know if we continue to stay with it in certain areas, we think we'll get some results here.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me