ShareThis Page

Penguins notebook: Brian Dumoulin unfazed despite taking another puck to the head

Jonathan Bombulie
| Sunday, Jan. 7, 2018, 8:00 p.m.
The Penguins' Brian Dumoulin is called for holding in the second period Saturday, Dec. 23, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Brian Dumoulin is called for holding in the second period Saturday, Dec. 23, 2017, at PPG Paints Arena.

NHL players are in constant danger of serious injury caused by a puck rising up and hitting them in the head. They just don't think about it.

And, yes, that applies to Penguins defenseman Brian Dumoulin, too.

Struck above the neck by a puck for the second time in a little more than a year, Dumoulin was back on the ice Sunday night against the Boston Bruins, making his return to the lineup five days after a shot off the stick of Philadelphia's Claude Giroux gave him a concussion.

“I was just boxing a guy out and didn't even see it,” Dumoulin said. “When I got hit, it kind of felt like a bell went off in my head. Obviously, you want to take it easy with concussions now and stuff like that. Feeling a lot better now.”

The last time Dumoulin took a puck to the head, on Dec. 27 of last season, he suffered a broken jaw that kept him out about a month after he was hit by a slap shot from New Jersey's Andy Greene.

Still, when he took the ice Sunday night, he did so without trepidation.

“It's not even something I think about, even after I got hit in the face last year with that slap shot,” Dumoulin said. “I didn't see that puck coming either. It's one of those things where you don't really think about it until it happens. Fortunately, it didn't hit me in the face again.”

Defensive depth

In addition to Dumoulin's return, Chad Ruhwedel, out since Dec. 27 with an upper-body injury, returned to morning skate in a full-contact capacity, though he was scratched for the game against the Bruins.

Even after Frankie Corrado cleared waivers and was assigned to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton in the afternoon, the Penguins were left with eight reasonably healthy defensemen.

That means two things. First, if general manager Jim Rutherford intends to deal from a position of depth to address a position of weakness in coming weeks, he could trade a defenseman for a center or left wing. Second, in the meantime, coach Mike Sullivan will have a difficult decision when choosing which defensemen to scratch.

On Sunday, Ian Cole drew the short straw.

“We're looking for smart, efficient, calculated decisions back there,” Sullivan said. “I think when we play that way, I think we're harder to play against because we don't turn the puck over as much. That's what we're asking of all of our defensemen.”

Splitting up

The Penguins started the game with Evgeni Malkin centering Carl Hagelin and Patric Hornqvist on the second line and Phil Kessel playing with Conor Sheary and center Jake Guentzel on the third line.

Sullivan said he ideally would like to keep the Malkin-Kessel combo apart.

“I think we're harder to play against when we have the balance through our lineup,” Sullivan said. “We become a team that is difficult to play against from a matchup standpoint, from a lot of different standpoints.”

Picking Jarry

It's a move that would have seemed preposterous at the end of last season, when Matt Murray was winning his second consecutive Stanley Cup championship and Tristan Jarry was finishing his apprenticeship in the AHL, but it made perfect sense Sunday.

Jarry started over a healthy and rested Murray against the Bruins.

Jarry was 2-2-0 with a .958 save percentage in his previous five appearances. Murray is 1-3-0 with a .867 save percentage in his last five games.

“We know (Murray is) going to pull his game together and be an important part of our team moving forward,” Sullivan said. “Right now, Tristan's playing extremely well, and we think he's deserving of the start.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me