ShareThis Page
Penguins

Penguins' Sidney Crosby named Nova Scotia's greatest athlete

Jonathan Bombulie
| Friday, July 27, 2018, 12:03 a.m.
Cole Harbour native Sidney Crosby was honored as Nova Scotia’s greatest athlete Thursday night.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Cole Harbour native Sidney Crosby was honored as Nova Scotia’s greatest athlete Thursday night.

In a nearly unanimous vote, Penguins captain Sidney Crosby was honored as Nova Scotia’s greatest athlete at a ceremony Thursday night in Halifax.

Crosby, a three-time Stanley Cup champion and two-time winner of the Hart Trophy, Art Ross Trophy and Olympic gold medal, finished ahead of two-time world champion curler Colleen Jones and NHL great Al MacInnis in the balloting of 36 athletes, coaches, media members and Nova Scotia sports experts.

“I think I’ve understood over the years that you have a small window to do something you love, and for whatever reason, that was instilled pretty early,” Crosby said during a Q-and-A session at the ceremony, according to the Canadian Press. “I know that at one point it’s going to stop, but I want to make sure that I enjoy every minute of it.”

Nova Scotia Sports Hall of Fame CEO Bruce Rainnie told the Canadian Press that 35 of 36 first-place votes went to Crosby, a Cole Harbour native.

The list was long on variety and short on hockey players.

The rest of the top 10 was Olympic swimmer Nancy Garapick, turn-of-the-century boxers Sam Langford and George Dixon, marathon runner Johnny Miles, sprinter Aileen Meagher, canoeist Steve Giles and softball player Mark Smith.

Longtime NHL scorer Glen Murray, former Penguins great Lowell MacDonald and active NHL stars Brad Marchand and Nathan MacKinnon did not make the list.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me