ShareThis Page
Penguins

Penguins Predictions: Which right wing will spend the most time on Sidney Crosby's line?

Jonathan Bombulie
| Monday, Aug. 20, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

Editor’s note: Beat writer Jonathan Bombulie will make a series of Penguins predictions leading up to the start of training camp Sept. 14.

THE QUESTION

Which right wing will see the most time on the top line alongside Jake Guentzel and Sidney Crosby?

MULTIPLE CHOICE

A. Patric Hornqvist

When Guentzel and Crosby were pouring in goals during the playoffs, Hornqvist was their right wing. His hard-nosed game and net-front presence are a good complement for skilled players. However, he doesn’t have the speed or give-and-go game that Crosby likes in his linemates. His shot-attempt percentage with Crosby last year (54.3) was the worst among the top four candidates for the job. When they were on the ice together five on five, the Penguins were outscored, 9-8.

B. Dominik Simon

A crafty winger with a history of playing with top players, Simon’s style meshes well with Crosby. The pair reportedly trained together in Nova Scotia in the offseason. Their numbers playing together at five on five last season (60.6 shot-attempt percentage, 13-8 scoring advantage) were the best among the top candidates. On the other hand, Simon wasn’t consistent in his first NHL trial last season, especially in the playoffs. If Simon, a lefty, plays on the right wing, it creates a righty logjam further down the lineup card.

C. Daniel Sprong

Sprong has massive natural goal-scoring talent. He was on Crosby’s line during the captain’s most dominant offensive performance of the regular season, a 4-0 win over the Islanders on Jan. 5. Sprong, though, isn’t good defensively, which could make Crosby spend too much of his time worrying about being the responsible one on the line.

D. Bryan Rust

Rust has the speed Crosby likes on his wing and consistently does the chores like defending, forechecking and digging pucks out of the corner that skill lines need to get done. But Crosby’s creativity is light years ahead of Rust’s, which can create a styles clash. Given the surplus of right-handed shooters on the roster, Rust might be needed on the left.

E. None of the above

The Penguins haven’t tried Phil Kessel with Crosby in a while. … If Derick Brassard is going to see some time on the wing, why not right wing? … Coach Mike Sullivan tries to avoid asking inexperienced players to switch to their off wing, but Aston-Reese showed some chemistry with Crosby during a brief trial last season.

THE PREDICTION

B. Dominik Simon

It’s one of the greatest conundrums related to Crosby’s game. On one hand, he’s willing and able to elevate lesser talents on his wings, which creates dangerous balance on the team’s other lines. On the other hand, doesn’t one of the greatest players in the history of the game deserve as much talent on his wings as a team can possibly provide? Ultimately, Crosby and Guentzel need a third wheel who can play a smart game and do the little things right. Simon fits that description better than Hornqvist or Sprong. Also, the numbers Crosby and Simon put up together in 244 five-on-five minutes last year were really strong. Sullivan knows that.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me