ShareThis Page

Penguins coach Mike Sullivan hopes to get Daniel Sprong more ice time

Jonathan Bombulie
| Friday, Oct. 5, 2018, 2:45 p.m.
The Penguins’ Daniel Sprong skates with the top line during the first day of camp Friday, Sept. 14, 2018 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Daniel Sprong skates with the top line during the first day of camp Friday, Sept. 14, 2018 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.

Top prospect Daniel Sprong played sparingly in the Pittsburgh Penguins’ season-opening 7-6 overtime win over the Washington Capitals on Thursday night, but that wasn’t by design and it’s not a blueprint for his future, coach Mike Sullivan said after practice Friday.

Sprong saw the least ice time of the 18 skaters who dressed for the Penguins, playing 6 minutes, 47 seconds. He saw 2:22 of ice time with the second power-play unit, recording an assist on Jake Guentzel’s second-period goal. He only played two shifts in the third period.

“I’d like to get him more minutes,” Sullivan said. “That’s the way it played out in that particular game last night. My intent going in is to get him more minutes to give him an opportunity to get into the game and build his confidence and give him an opportunity to play his game. To his defense, I don’t think he had sufficient time last night to do that.

“As a coaching staff, we’re trying to walk the line of making sure we do our best to win games at the same time. Moving forward, our hope is that I can get him involved more and find more minutes for him.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me