ShareThis Page
Penguins

T.J. Oshie scores late goal, extends Penguins' skid to five games

Jonathan Bombulie
| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 10:27 p.m.
Capitals center Lars Eller (20) tries to get the pack past Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith and defenseman Kris Letang during the first period Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington.
Capitals center Lars Eller (20) tries to get the pack past Penguins goaltender Casey DeSmith and defenseman Kris Letang during the first period Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington.
Capitals center Evgeny Kuznetsov (92) scuffles with Penguins right wing Patric Hornqvist during the second period Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington.
Capitals center Evgeny Kuznetsov (92) scuffles with Penguins right wing Patric Hornqvist during the second period Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington.
Penguins right wing Phil Kessel (81) and Capitals goaltender Braden Holtby watch the puck during the second period Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington.
Penguins right wing Phil Kessel (81) and Capitals goaltender Braden Holtby watch the puck during the second period Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Washington.

WASHINGTON — Beaten and battered all game long, T.J. Oshie extended the misery of the Pittsburgh Penguins when the game was on the line Wednesday night.

Oshie scored a clutch tiebreaking goal with less than two minutes left, leading the Washington Capitals to a 2-1 victory over the Penguins, who have lost five in a row.

In the first period, Oshie took an unpenalized high-stick from Olli Maatta and went to the locker room for repairs.

In the third period, Oshie took a shoulder to the chin and again had to leave the ice. After he was checked for a concussion and Malkin was assessed a match penalty for a check to the head, Oshie returned and played the hero’s role.

John Carlson took a pass from Evgeny Kuznetsov and waited at the left point for Oshie to cruise in front of the net. Penguins goalie Casey DeSmith leaned to his right for just a second to look past Alex Ovechkin and Maatta, who were tangled up in front. At that exact moment, Carlson hit Oshie with a perfect pass for the goal from the far post.

“The outcome, that one really hurts because we played so well and (had) so many chances, so many opportunities to go ahead in the third period, second period,” DeSmith said. “We just played so solid tonight.”

Coach Mike Sullivan was uncharacteristically curt in his postgame meeting with reporters. Although he didn’t say so, officiating was likely the target of his silent rage.

On the match penalty, Oshie approached Malkin as the Penguins center entered the offensive zone. Malkin did not change his path, but he delivered a jarring shoulder to Oshie’s chin.

“I think (Oshie) kind of wants the contact there,” winger Carl Hagelin said.

Match penalties automatically are reviewed by the league for supplemental discipline. Sullivan said he didn’t expect Malkin to be suspended, but he offered no other commentary.

“It doesn’t matter what I think,” Sullivan said.

Oshie’s goal aside, it was the best performance the Penguins turned in during their five-game losing streak. That might not sound like a high bar, but a quick look at some stats shows how dominant the losing team actually was.

They held a 42-22 advantage in shots and a massive 70-29 edge in even-strength shot attempts.

When Sidney Crosby was on the ice at even strength, the Penguins outshot the Capitals, 17-2. They were outscored 1-0.

“It’s more encouraging after we played tonight, definitely, but we still came out with nothing,” Crosby said. “It’s still frustrating.”

Crosby scored the Penguins’ goal on a first-period power play.

Jack Johnson grabbed a puck that held been fumbled by the Washington penalty kill and shuffled a cross-ice pass to Crosby at the bottom of the right faceoff circle for a one-timer and a goal.

It was one of eight shots on goal for Crosby in the game. Braden Holtby, the game’s No. 1 star, stopped the other seven.

“We were on our toes. We were physical. We generated some really good chances,” Crosby said. “We’ve just got to put the puck in the net. We’ll do that if we get those chances.”

The biggest problem the Penguins ran into was they took five penalties before Malkin’s hit on Oshie.

Washington scored on its third chance with the man advantage on Ovechkin’s trademark one-timer from the left faceoff circle in the second period.

“When you have to kill that many, especially against that power play, and they do the job they did, it’s frustrating that we don’t get rewarded with at least a point there,” Crosby said.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me