ShareThis Page
Penguins

Penguins notebook: Five defensemen dress against San Jose

| Sunday, March 29, 2015, 7:42 p.m.

It was unorthodox, and it certainly wasn't ideal.

The Penguins, because of salary cap and injury issues, dressed only five defensemen against the San Jose Sharks on Sunday at Consol Energy.

Injuries to defensemen Kris Letang and Christian Ehrhoff kept the duo out of the lineup.

“It definitely is different to play with only five,” defenseman Derrick Pouliot said. “You kind of know going in that you're all going to have to play bigger minutes. It's just something you have to be prepared for.”

The Penguins would have preferred to recall a defensemen from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.

Doing so, however, could have come with consequences.

None of their current forwards, including Beau Bennett, were eligible to be sent to the AHL without being exposed to waivers.

Because of this, Pouliot, Paul Martin, Rob Scuderi, Ian Cole and Ben Lovejoy shouldered the load against the Sharks.

The Penguins, at least, had some practice at playing with five defensemen.

Before their game March 21 in Arizona, the Penguins learned they had to play with five defensemen because Ehrhoff was a late scratch.

“It's tough for the guys playing defense, obviously,” right wing Craig Adams said. “The most important thing we can do to help them is to control the puck as much as possible in the offensive zone.”

Another key variable for the defensemen, Pouliot said, is to stay out of the penalty box.

“When you're already a man short, you can't really lose too many people to penalties,” Pouliot said. “That isn't helping anyone.”

Had the Penguins played a man short against the Sharks, a league stipulation states they would have been able to recall a player from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton on an emergency basis for Wednesday's game against the Flyers should they require one. A team must play with 19 or fewer players in one game to qualify for the emergency play in the following game. They also would have been eligible to use an emergency player against St. Louis on March 24 but didn't need one.

The Penguins are unable to put Letang or Ehrhoff on the long-term injured reserve list because there are fewer than 10 games remaining in the regular season, and being placed on that list requires players to miss at least 10 games.

Emergency man

Playing with five defensemen forced the Penguins to consider an emergency player, should one or two of their blue liners get injured or ejected.

The answer came in the form of left wing Daniel Winnik, who has been a defenseman at various stages of his career.

The veteran forward said he'd be ready, just in case.

“I guess so,” he said. “If it happens, I'd be more than happy to go back.”

Perron makes return

Coach Mike Johnston said Sunday morning that winger David Perron would miss a second straight game with an illness.

But Perron took warmups and played against the Sharks.

Perron has scored 12 goals in 36 games with the Penguins.

Optional workout

The Penguins rarely hold morning skates on the second day of back-to-back weekend games but had an optional skate Sunday. Nine players took part in the workout. The Penguins will not practice Monday.

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jyohe@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me