ShareThis Page

Penguins notebook: Kessel draws mixed reaction in return to Toronto

Jonathan Bombulie
| Saturday, Oct. 31, 2015, 8:30 p.m.

TORONTO — Phil Kessel had an idea of what was coming when he played his first game at Air Canada Centre after a July 1 trade from the Maple Leafs to the Penguins.

“I figure there will be some boos,” he said before the game. “That's always how it is, right?”

Yep, Phil. That's how it is.

A portion of the sellout Saturday night crowd booed every time Kessel touched the puck. Most fans, however, did not.

It's easy to see why the crowd was split.

On one hand, Kessel was the team's leading scorer for each of his six seasons in Toronto.

He scored more goals in a Maple Leafs jersey than the beloved Doug Gilmour. He had more points than Canadian hockey hero Paul Henderson.

On the other hand, five of Kessel's six seasons in Toronto ended without a playoff appearance.

“No regrets from me,” Kessel said. “I signed (an eight-year contract) here. I expected to be here. I guess the Leafs had different plans.”

Fehr debuts

With only a few reporters in front of his locker, Eric Fehr had all the pregame elbow room he needed as he prepared to make his season debut after offseason elbow surgery. He thanked Kessel for that.

“It's great that I can come back today and have Phil's comeback to Toronto and just slide right in under the radar and not have to worry about anything,” Fehr said. “It's great to get in there and play and just do what I have to do.”

Sprong sits

With Fehr in the lineup, 18-year-old winger Daniel Sprong was a healthy scratch for the Penguins.

Sprong has played eight games. Before he plays 10, the Penguins will have to decide whether to keep him and burn the first year of his entry-level contract or send him back to juniors.

Despite Saturday's scratch, coach Mike Johnston didn't say anything that could be interpreted as a precursor to sending him packing.

“With Spronger, he may not be in every night,” Johnston said. “For a young guy, sometimes it's good to take a look at the game from up top, get a couple days of practice. It's not like he's going to be in every game, but I feel like his game is really progressing. That's what we wanted. We want to keep his game moving in the right direction.”

Sarge in charge

Sergei Gonchar began his duties as defenseman development coach Saturday, standing behind the bench for morning skate.

He is expected to make the upcoming Western Canada trip with the team.


Toronto coach Mike Babcock is struggling with his daily goaltending decisions.

On Saturday night, Jonathan Bernier got the start over James Reimer, even though Bernier played the night before in a 3-1 loss to the Rangers in New York.

When it comes to career record against the Penguins, Reimer would have been the obvious choice. Coming into the game, he was 4-0-2 with a 2.26 goals-against average. Bernier was 0-4-2 with a 3.31 GAA.

This season, against the league as a whole, Bernier has been a little better. His .904 save percentage is superior to Reimer's .876.

“There's lots of things you do because what you did didn't work,” Babcock said. “I wear a (three-piece suit) for Original Six games. When you lose three in a row, guess what I didn't wear last night? Definition of insanity. I don't know the right answer.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me