ShareThis Page

Penguins notebook: NHL's lesser lights prove troublesome

Jonathan Bombulie
| Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2016, 7:18 p.m.
Penguins defenseman Ben Lovejoy plays against the Avalanche Nov. 2015 at Consol Energy Center.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Penguins defenseman Ben Lovejoy plays against the Avalanche Nov. 2015 at Consol Energy Center.

On Sunday, the Penguins played a home game against a middle-of-the-road Carolina team starting its back-up goalie and scored a convincing 5-0 win.

On Monday, the Penguins played their back-up goalie on the road against a big, talented St. Louis team and suffered a 5-2 loss.

They won a game they were expected to win, and lost a game they were expected to lose.

Perhaps surprisingly, that has been the exception and not the rule for the Penguins for much of this season.

The Penguins have their share of good wins. They're 4-1-1 against the top six playoff teams in the East, for instance, owning victories over division-leading Washington and Florida.

They also have their share of bad losses. They're 1-3-1 against the worst four teams in the Western Conference, suffering defeats at the hands of squads such as Winnipeg, Calgary and Edmonton.

In other words, the Penguins' results have not been dictated in any meaningful way by the quality of their opposition.

“When the Pittsburgh Penguins are playing their best hockey, we're an incredibly difficult team to beat, whether you're the best team in the league or the worst,” defenseman Ben Lovejoy said. “Along the same lines, when we're not playing well, we can lose to anybody.”

“Since (coach) Mike (Sullivan) has been here, he's really focused on us. We can win a game and we'll come in the next morning and watch video of the game, and you leave feeling like you lost because he wants us to clean up our game. He's not satisfied with one win here, one win there. He wants us to be consistent.

“We're getting better at it, but we're not perfect yet.”

Nice shot

In one of the more entertaining two-minute stretches of the season, Evgeni Malkin and St. Louis star Vladimir Tarasenko traded highlight-reel goals in the second period Monday night.

Malkin used a power move to beat Jay Bouwmeester up the right wing to give the Penguins a 2-1 lead. Tarasenko used a similar move to get past Lovejoy to tie the score.

After the game, Malkin used the occasion to take a playful shot at his friend and fellow countryman.

“He's a skilled guy,” Malkin said. “It's not the first goal I've seen like that. He turns back and makes a quick turn forward. He's pretty good with that move. I think he scored a couple of goals like that.

“It's a good move, but it's not like mine.”


Newly acquired winger Carl Hagelin is the first Penguins player to wear No. 62.

There are three other players on the current roster who have a number all to themselves in team history.

Two — Sidney Crosby (87) and Kris Letang (58) — are obvious.

The third is more obscure. Lovejoy wore No. 65 for his first few games up from the minors in 2008-09.

Climbing the charts

With a sizzling stretch of five goals and 11 assists in his past 10 games, Letang has returned to a familiar spot on the NHL leaderboard.

With 30 points in 35 games, he's moved into the top 10 in the league in defenseman scoring.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me