Brian Dumoulin, Jared McCann scratched for Penguins vs. Golden Knights |

Brian Dumoulin, Jared McCann scratched for Penguins vs. Golden Knights

Seth Rorabaugh
Penguins defenseman Brian Dumoulin was scratched from Saturday’s home game against the Vegas Golden Knights.

The Penguins are missing two more of their regular players for Saturday’s game against the Vegas Golden Knights at PPG Paints Arena.

Defensemen Brian Dumoulin and Jared McCann are scratched from the lineup. In their place will be defensemen Erik Gudbranson and Juuso Riikola.

There was no immediate word on the reason for either Dumoulin or McCann being absent.

Dumoulin has appeared in eight game this season and recorded three points. He had an assist in Friday’s 4-2 home win against the Dallas Stars.

McCann has played in seven games and has four points (three goals, one assist). He scored the Penguins’ first goal on Friday.

With McCann sidelined, rookie Sam Lafferty began the contest at the center position on the second line while Riikola replaced Lafferty as a winger on the fourth line. Riikola played on the fourth line during Wednesday’s 3-2 overtime win against the Colorado Avalanche.

With Dumoulin absent, Jack Johnson replaced him as Kris Letang’s partner on the top defensive pairing. Gudbranson replaced Johnson on the third pairing.

The Penguins entered the game with forwards Nick Bjugstad, Alex Galchenyuk, Evgeni Malkin, Bryan Rust and defenseman Zach Trotman already on injured reserve.

Follow the Penguins all season long.

Seth Rorabaugh is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Seth by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.