Penn State clinches 8th NCAA wrestling title in 9 years |
Penn State

Penn State clinches 8th NCAA wrestling title in 9 years

Paul Schofield
Penn State’s Vincenzo Joseph beats ASU’s Joshua Shields Friday, March 22, 2019 during semifinal round 2019 NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship action at PPG Paints Arena.

The suspense of which team was going to win another NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship title ended early on Saturday at PPG Paints Arena.

Penn State claimed its eighth team title in the past nine years during the morning session and ninth in school history.

Penn State has five wrestlers competing for national titles tonight. They are: Jason Nolf (157 pounds), Vincenzo Joseph (164), Mark Hall (174), Bo Nickal (194) and heavyweight Anthony Cassar. Nolf (Kittanning), Joseph (Central Catholic) and Nickal are going for their third titles.

It’s the second time that the Nittany Lions have won four-consecutive titles under Cael Sanderson.

College Videos

The title was clinched when Ohio State’s Luke Pletcher (Latrobe) didn’t pin Iowa’s Austin DeSanto in his 133-pound consolation round match. He did rally to defeat DeSanto, 7-6, with a takedown with 17 seconds left.

Pletcher will wrestle for third place against Michigan’s Stevan Micic, but Penn State wrestlers can relax knowing the team title was in the bag.

Penn State moves into third place on the all-time titles list behind Oklahoma State 34 and Iowa 23. Iowa State is now fourth with eight.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.