Penn State gets first test against Top 25 team |
Penn State

Penn State gets first test against Top 25 team

Associated Press
Penn State wide receiver Jahan Dotson (5) is lifted by offensive lineman Mike Miranda (73) after he scored on a 72-yard touchdown pass in the first quarter against Purdue last Saturday.

IOWA CITY, Iowa — Penn State has beaten its first five opponents by nearly 40 points per game.

The Nittany Lions’ next three games might not be quite so easy.

No. 10 Penn State’s playoff hopes likely will hinge on how it performs during a brutal stretch that begins Saturday at 17th-ranked Iowa. The Hawkeyes (4-1, 1-1 Big Ten) will be the first Top-25 team the Nittany Lions (5-0, 2-0) face this season, and they will be followed by a home date with No. 16 Michigan and a trip to Michigan State.

Iowa also will represent the biggest test yet for quarterback Sean Clifford and Penn State’s high-flying offense. The Hawkeyes are third nationally in scoring defense at 8.8 points a game, behind Wisconsin (5.8) and the Nittany Lions (7.4) in coach Kirk Ferentz’s 21st season in charge.

“It’s amazing. You put the tape on, especially on the defensive side of the ball, it looks the same as it did four years ago,” Penn State coach James Franklin said. “I hope that (doesn’t) come off the wrong way, because I mean that as the ultimate compliment. They do what they do, and they do it really well.”

Iowa’s defense was brilliant in last week’s 10-3 loss at Michigan, holding the Wolverines to 267 yards. The Hawkeyes were pitiful on offense as senior quarterback Nate Stanley threw his first three interceptions of the season. Iowa also allowed eight sacks and finished with 1 yard rushing.

“The negative yardage plays are always going to affect you,” Ferentz said. “Part of that was our lack of execution. Maybe part of that’s Michigan, being a really athletic, aggressive defensive team. But that being said, we are looking at the same kind of opponent this week.”

Clifford, a first-year starter, leads the Big Ten with 288.6 yards a game, and his 16 yards per completion ranks sixth nationally. But Iowa excels at defending the pass. The Hawkeyes are giving up 5.9 yards per attempt and have as many interceptions, four, as passing touchdowns allowed.

“Looks like he’s got a great future, so hopefully we can find a way to slow him down a little bit,” Ferentz said of Clifford.

Iowa and Penn State have been known to put on a show. The Nittany Lions won in Iowa City in 2017 on a walk-off touchdown pass from Trace McSorley, and last year Stanley threw a pick at Penn State’s goal line with 3:18 left as the Nittany Lions survived 30-24.

Iowa has lost five straight in the series, but prior to that, the Hawkeyes won eight of nine in the series — including a last-second 24-23 win in 2008 that knocked Penn State out of the national title chase.

Categories: Sports | Penn State
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.