Penn State grad Alyssa Naeher saves best for World Cup semifinals |
U.S./World Sports

Penn State grad Alyssa Naeher saves best for World Cup semifinals

Associated Press
United States goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher saves a penalty kick from England’s Steph Houghton during the Women’s World Cup semifinal against England on Tuesday, July 2, 2019.
United States goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher prepares to kick the ball during the Women’s World Cup semifinal match between England and the United States, at the Stade de Lyon, outside Lyon, France, Tuesday, July 2, 2019.

LYON, France — Alyssa Naeher finally escaped Hope Solo’s shadow with her smothering save of a penalty kick.

Endlessly compared to her controversial predecessor on the U.S. national team, Naeher cemented her legacy when she preserved the United States’ 2-1 semifinal win over England. It was the first penalty save by a U.S. goalkeeper in regulation at the Women’s World Cup.

“Oh my God, Alyssa played absolutely out of her mind, but that is what she does day-in and day-out,” defender Kelley O’Hara said. “I’m proud the world finally got to see that. She proved she’s the best in the world, surely.”

Naeher, a Penn State graduate, has been peppered with questions about Solo in the run-up to the tournament and all through the team’s journey through France. She has been gracious about answering every time — even right after Tuesday night’s match.

“I don’t get wrapped up in the comparisons. I’ve said from the beginning that I just try to be me. My goal every day is just being a better person, better player than I was yesterday,” she said. “It’s not about comparisons. It’s how can I help this team win now in 2019. How can I help this team win a gold medal? That’s my only focus.”

It has been this way since Naeher emerged as the presumptive starter after Solo’s dismissal from the team.

Solo made 202 appearances with the national team with 153 wins and an international-record 102 shutouts. During the 2015 World Cup championship run, she allowed just three goals in seven games with five shutouts. She won two consecutive Golden Glove awards for best goalkeeper.

But she also created controversy, and her contract with the team was terminated after she infamously called Sweden “cowards” for bunkering on defense in the quarterfinals of the 2016 Olympics.

Naeher assumed Solo’s role in the ensuing years, but some criticized U.S. Soccer for relying too heavily on Solo without developing a strong successor.

Naeher has shut out the naysayers by humbly doing her job. Known for being soft-spoken and unshakeable, she does crosswords on gamedays to relax. She made her debut with the senior national team in 2014 and has 52 international caps with 28 shutouts.

She was solid from the start in France. The United States did not concede a goal in the group stage for the first time at a World Cup. Until Spain’s Jennifer Hermoso scored to open the knockout round, the U.S. had not allowed a goal since an April friendly against Australia.

But Naeher’s defining moment came in the 84th minute against England on Tuesday night.

With the United States clinging to its 2-1 lead late, a video review determined Becky Sauerbrunn fouled England’s Ellen White in the penalty area. Naeher was there to envelop England captain Steph Houghton’s shot, helping ensure the U.S. would move on to Sunday’s championship game.

Naeher’s twin sister, Amanda, and her parents celebrated wildly in the seats at Stade de Lyon, and on the field Naeher urged her teammates to focus for the final minutes.

“To come up big in that moment, for her personally, but also for the team, it’s massive,” midfielder Megan Rapinoe said. “It can’t be overstated.”

Note: The U.S.-England semifinal averaged nearly 8 million U.S. viewers. The game was the most-watched English-language soccer telecast in the country since last year’s men’s World Cup final.

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.