Penn State podcast: Talking another NCAA wrestling title, Creamery ice cream and March Madness | TribLIVE.com
Penn State

Penn State podcast: Talking another NCAA wrestling title, Creamery ice cream and March Madness

Another year, another national title for Cael Sanderson and Penn State wrestling (the program’s fourth straight and eighth in the past nine years). In this week’s installment of “The Obligatory PSU Pregame Show,” Mike the Mailman and Kevin regale Chris and Brandon with tales of their weekend in Pittsburgh for the national tournament, from the drama on the mat and lousy sight lines to their after-hours adventures sampling local craft beer and sneaking into alumni functions.

Have Lions fans become spoiled by Penn State’s annual dominance of NCAA wrestling?

Perhaps even more importantly, the world-famous Penn State Berkey Creamery is pitting some of its most beloved flavors (and raspberry frozen yogurt) against each other in its Flavor Madness bracket challenge, and the “Obligatory” team has the scoop (sorry).

The guys break down all the key matchups, including an egregious seeding error that calls the entire tournament’s validity into question, while continuing their campaign for a Mailman-themed ice cream flavor. #MaltTheMailman

“The Obligatory PSU Pregame Show” stars former Penn State defensive tackle (1992-96) Brandon Noble, beloved campus icon Mike “The Mailman” Herr, and Other Cast Members Kevin Horne and Chris Buchignani.


942284_web1_gtr-Obligatory-032819
Blue White Media
“The Obligatory PSU Pregame Show”
Categories: Sports | Penn State
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.