Penn State, West Virginia, Pitt teams recognized for academic progress |

Penn State, West Virginia, Pitt teams recognized for academic progress

Jerry DiPaola

A total of 11 teams at Penn State, Pitt and West Virginia earned NCAA Public Recognition Awards for outstanding academic progress based on scores from the 2014-15 through 2017-18 school years.

The awards are presented annually to teams finishing among the top 10 percent of their respective sport.

Among the four Penn State teams recognized was the wrestling team, which has won four consecutive national championships while earning the academic award five years in a row.

Penn State’s women’s cross country and fencing and men’s golf also were honored.

At West Virginia, the men’s basketball, rifle, golf and tennis teams were recognized. The basketball team has been recognized in four consecutive years and six in the past 10.

Pitt teams honored were women’s basketball, cross country and tennis. The Panthers have had 25 teams recognized in the 14 years since the APR has been tracked, including three or more in each of the past four years.

The university discontinued the tennis program at the end of this season.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | WVU | Penn State | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.